SLYG vs. CAFG

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SLYG (SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF) and CAFG (Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds - SLYG tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index while CAFG tracks the Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SLYG returned 15.87%/yr vs 15.59%/yr for CAFG. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SLYG charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for CAFG.

Performance

SLYG vs. CAFG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (CAFG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLYG achieves a 16.95% return, which is significantly lower than CAFG's 27.15% return.

SLYG

• 1D: 1.25%
• 1M: 0.60%
• YTD: 16.95%
• 6M: 14.97%
• 1Y: 28.13%
• 3Y*: 15.87%
• 5Y*: 5.76%
• 10Y*: 10.87%

CAFG

• 1D: 1.09%
• 1M: 2.66%
• YTD: 27.15%
• 6M: 25.89%
• 1Y: 32.91%
• 3Y*: 15.59%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLYG vs. CAFG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SLYG SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF	16.95%	5.20%	9.38%	20.05%
CAFG Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF	27.15%	0.17%	6.95%	20.44%

Correlation

The correlation between SLYG and CAFG is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2023	0.93

The correlation between SLYG and CAFG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

SLYG vs. CAFG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SLYG	CAFG
Technology	20.1%	30.8%
Industrials	19.5%	19.3%
Healthcare	14.4%	18.8%
Financial Services	13.9%	-
Consumer Cyclical	10.4%	7.2%
Real Estate	6.4%	-
Energy	5.1%	13.4%
Communication Services	2.8%	3.7%
Consumer Defensive	2.8%	3.0%
Basic Materials	2.8%	2.4%
Utilities	1.9%	1.4%

Return for Risk

SLYG vs. CAFG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLYG

SLYG Risk / Return Rank: 53
SLYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
SLYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
SLYG Omega Ratio Rank: 45
SLYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
SLYG Martin Ratio Rank: 61

CAFG

CAFG Risk / Return Rank: 64
CAFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
CAFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
CAFG Omega Ratio Rank: 53
CAFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
CAFG Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLYG vs. CAFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (CAFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SLYG	CAFG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.61	1.90	-0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.38	2.72	-0.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.32	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.11	4.06	-0.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.86	13.23	-2.38
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SLYG vs. CAFG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLYG Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the CAFG Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLYG and CAFG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SLYG	CAFG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.61	1.90	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.27	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.31	0.89	-0.58

Drawdowns

SLYG vs. CAFG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLYG drawdown since its inception was -62.15%, which is greater than CAFG's maximum drawdown of -23.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLYG and CAFG.

Drawdown Indicators

	SLYG	CAFG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.15%	-23.66%	-38.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.10%	-8.13%	-0.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.39%	-23.66%	-3.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.18%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.86%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.18%	0.00%	-0.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.55%	-5.52%	-9.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.60%	2.49%	+0.11%

Volatility

SLYG vs. CAFG - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (CAFG) have volatilities of 4.47% and 4.61%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SLYG	CAFG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.47%	4.61%	-0.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.52%	12.78%	-0.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.56%	17.40%	+0.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.52%	19.57%	+1.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.74%	19.57%	+3.17%

SLYG vs. CAFG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLYG has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CAFG's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

SLYG vs. CAFG - Dividend Comparison

SLYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, more than CAFG's 0.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CAFG Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF	0.34%	0.35%	0.36%	0.39%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SLYG SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF	0.70%	0.86%	1.22%	1.18%	1.18%	0.68%	0.71%	1.08%	1.06%	4.74%	1.13%	5.75%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SLYG and CAFG in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, SLYG and CAFG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SLYG or CAFG?

CAFG has higher volatility (4.61%) compared to SLYG (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLYG dropped -62.15% vs CAFG's -23.66%.

Which ETF is better, SLYG or CAFG?

On 3-year performance, SLYG leads with 15.87% vs 15.59% for CAFG. On fees, SLYG is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SLYG has been the lower-risk option at 4.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SLYG or CAFG?

Over the 3-year period, SLYG has performed better with a 15.87% return vs 15.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SLYG or CAFG?

SLYG is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for CAFG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SLYG or CAFG?

SLYG has the higher dividend yield at 0.70%, compared with 0.34% for CAFG.

What is the main difference between SLYG and CAFG?

SLYG tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index, while CAFG tracks Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SLYG and 0.59% for CAFG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CAFG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.