SLYG vs. VBK
SLYG (SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF) and VBK (Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds - SLYG tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index while VBK tracks the CRSP US Small Cap Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SLYG returned 11.75%/yr vs 12.20%/yr for VBK. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SLYG charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VBK.
Performance
SLYG vs. VBK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLYG achieves a 21.87% return, which is significantly higher than VBK's 18.61% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SLYG having a 11.75% annualized return and VBK not far ahead at 12.20%.
SLYG
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 6.00%
- YTD
- 21.87%
- 6M
- 17.87%
- 1Y
- 34.08%
- 3Y*
- 16.89%
- 5Y*
- 6.59%
- 10Y*
- 11.75%
VBK
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 3.11%
- YTD
- 18.61%
- 6M
- 15.14%
- 1Y
- 33.39%
- 3Y*
- 18.20%
- 5Y*
- 5.09%
- 10Y*
- 12.20%
SLYG vs. VBK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLYG SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF | 21.87% | 5.20% | 9.38% | 17.27% | -21.26% | 22.42% | 19.48% | 20.97% | -4.20% | 14.62% |
VBK Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF | 18.61% | 8.50% | 16.50% | 21.45% | -28.44% | 5.66% | 35.44% | 32.75% | -5.70% | 21.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLYG and VBK is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004 | 0.93 |
The correlation between SLYG and VBK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
SLYG vs. VBK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SLYG
VBK
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Utilities
Technology
SLYG
VBK
Industrials
SLYG
VBK
Healthcare
SLYG
VBK
Financial Services
SLYG
VBK
Consumer Cyclical
SLYG
VBK
Real Estate
SLYG
VBK
Energy
SLYG
VBK
Consumer Defensive
SLYG
VBK
Communication Services
SLYG
VBK
Basic Materials
SLYG
VBK
Utilities
SLYG
VBK
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLYG vs. VBK — Risk / Return Rank
SLYG
VBK
SLYG vs. VBK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) and Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLYG | VBK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.28 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.76 | 2.93 | +0.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.24 | 10.98 | +2.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLYG vs. VBK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLYG drawdown since its inception was -62.92%, which is greater than VBK's maximum drawdown of -58.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLYG and VBK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLYG | VBK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.92% | -58.68% | -4.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.10% | -11.44% | +2.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.39% | -27.54% | +0.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.18% | -38.39% | +9.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.86% | -38.70% | -3.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.05% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.88% | -10.14% | -4.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | 3.05% | -0.47% |
Volatility
SLYG vs. VBK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) is 5.21%, while Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK) has a volatility of 6.94%. This indicates that SLYG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VBK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLYG | VBK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.21% | 6.94% | -1.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.96% | 15.58% | -2.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.96% | 20.07% | -2.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.56% | 23.62% | -2.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.77% | 22.94% | -0.17% |
SLYG vs. VBK - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLYG has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VBK's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SLYG vs. VBK - Dividend Comparison
SLYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, more than VBK's 0.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLYG SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF | 0.88% | 0.86% | 1.22% | 1.18% | 1.18% | 0.68% | 0.71% | 1.08% | 1.06% | 4.74% | 1.13% | 5.75% |
VBK Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF | 0.44% | 0.54% | 0.54% | 0.68% | 0.55% | 0.36% | 0.44% | 0.57% | 0.79% | 0.82% | 1.08% | 0.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLYG and VBK have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VBK has higher volatility (6.94%) compared to SLYG (5.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLYG dropped -62.92% vs VBK's -58.68%.
On 10-year performance, VBK leads with 12.20% vs 11.75% for SLYG. On fees, VBK is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, SLYG has been the lower-risk option at 5.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VBK has performed better with a 12.20% return vs 11.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VBK is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SLYG.
SLYG has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.44% for VBK.
SLYG tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index, while VBK tracks CRSP US Small Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SLYG and 0.05% for VBK.
SLYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLYG and VBK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer