SLYG vs. XSMO
SLYG (SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF) and XSMO (Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SLYG is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index, while XSMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SLYG returned 11.75%/yr vs 15.36%/yr for XSMO. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SLYG charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for XSMO.
Performance
SLYG vs. XSMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLYG achieves a 21.87% return, which is significantly lower than XSMO's 25.55% return. Over the past 10 years, SLYG has underperformed XSMO with an annualized return of 11.75%, while XSMO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.36% annualized return.
SLYG
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 6.00%
- YTD
- 21.87%
- 6M
- 17.87%
- 1Y
- 34.08%
- 3Y*
- 16.89%
- 5Y*
- 6.59%
- 10Y*
- 11.75%
XSMO
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 4.89%
- YTD
- 25.55%
- 6M
- 21.13%
- 1Y
- 37.28%
- 3Y*
- 25.72%
- 5Y*
- 11.94%
- 10Y*
- 15.36%
SLYG vs. XSMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLYG SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF | 21.87% | 5.20% | 9.38% | 17.27% | -21.26% | 22.42% | 19.48% | 20.97% | -4.20% | 14.62% |
XSMO Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF | 25.55% | 9.80% | 17.45% | 21.55% | -15.44% | 19.24% | 21.96% | 28.65% | -3.44% | 23.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLYG and XSMO is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2005 | 0.90 |
The correlation between SLYG and XSMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
SLYG vs. XSMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SLYG
XSMO
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Utilities
Technology
SLYG
XSMO
Industrials
SLYG
XSMO
Healthcare
SLYG
XSMO
Financial Services
SLYG
XSMO
Consumer Cyclical
SLYG
XSMO
Real Estate
SLYG
XSMO
Energy
SLYG
XSMO
Consumer Defensive
SLYG
XSMO
Communication Services
SLYG
XSMO
Basic Materials
SLYG
XSMO
Utilities
SLYG
XSMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLYG vs. XSMO — Risk / Return Rank
SLYG
XSMO
SLYG vs. XSMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLYG | XSMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.33 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.76 | 4.21 | -0.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.24 | 14.23 | -0.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLYG vs. XSMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLYG drawdown since its inception was -62.92%, which is greater than XSMO's maximum drawdown of -58.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLYG and XSMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLYG | XSMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.92% | -58.06% | -4.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.10% | -8.89% | -0.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.39% | -24.76% | -2.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.18% | -29.62% | +0.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.86% | -39.39% | -2.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.88% | -11.11% | -3.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | 2.63% | -0.05% |
Volatility
SLYG vs. XSMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) is 5.21%, while Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) has a volatility of 7.19%. This indicates that SLYG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLYG | XSMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.21% | 7.19% | -1.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.96% | 14.89% | -1.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.96% | 19.41% | -1.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.56% | 22.64% | -1.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.77% | 24.15% | -1.38% |
SLYG vs. XSMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLYG has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XSMO's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLYG vs. XSMO - Dividend Comparison
SLYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, more than XSMO's 0.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLYG SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF | 0.88% | 0.86% | 1.22% | 1.18% | 1.18% | 0.68% | 0.71% | 1.08% | 1.06% | 4.74% | 1.13% | 5.75% |
XSMO Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF | 0.66% | 0.75% | 0.63% | 0.96% | 1.19% | 0.30% | 0.82% | 0.69% | 0.66% | 0.27% | 0.30% | 0.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, SLYG and XSMO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
XSMO has higher volatility (7.19%) compared to SLYG (5.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLYG dropped -62.92% vs XSMO's -58.06%.
On 10-year performance, XSMO leads with 15.36% vs 11.75% for SLYG. On fees, SLYG is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SLYG has been the lower-risk option at 5.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XSMO has performed better with a 15.36% return vs 11.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SLYG is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for XSMO.
SLYG has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.66% for XSMO.
SLYG is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while XSMO is Momentum. SLYG tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index, while XSMO tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SLYG and 0.36% for XSMO.
XSMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLYG and XSMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer