PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLYG vs. SLYV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLYG vs. SLYV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLYG achieves a 22.81% return, which is significantly higher than SLYV's 20.36% return. Over the past 10 years, SLYG has outperformed SLYV with an annualized return of 11.13%, while SLYV has yielded a comparatively lower 10.28% annualized return.


SLYG

1D
-0.26%
1M
-1.84%
6M
17.16%
YTD
22.81%
1Y
32.40%
3Y*
14.03%
5Y*
6.56%
10Y*
11.13%
ALL TIME*
7.44%

SLYV

1D
0.14%
1M
0.37%
6M
12.96%
YTD
20.36%
1Y
39.50%
3Y*
12.50%
5Y*
8.01%
10Y*
10.28%
ALL TIME*
10.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$10.44M$11.89M$13.41M
$16.96M$15.72M$22.59M

SLYG vs. SLYV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SLYG
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF
22.81%5.20%9.38%17.27%-21.26%22.42%19.48%20.97%-4.20%14.62%
SLYV
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF
20.36%6.54%7.28%14.82%-11.08%30.57%2.68%24.26%-12.77%11.74%

Correlation

The correlation between SLYG and SLYV is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2000

0.88

The correlation between SLYG and SLYV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

SLYG vs. SLYV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SLYG
SLYV

Industrials

19.0%
12.3%

Technology

17.7%
11.3%

Healthcare

17.2%
6.3%

Financial Services

13.9%
21.6%

Consumer Cyclical

11.1%
15.5%

Real Estate

6.8%
8.2%

Energy

3.8%
7.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.3%
5.7%

Basic Materials

3.1%
5.7%

Communication Services

2.7%
3.8%

Utilities

1.6%
2.1%

Industrials

SLYG
19.0%
SLYV
12.3%

Technology

SLYG
17.7%
SLYV
11.3%

Healthcare

SLYG
17.2%
SLYV
6.3%

Financial Services

SLYG
13.9%
SLYV
21.6%

Consumer Cyclical

SLYG
11.1%
SLYV
15.5%

Real Estate

SLYG
6.8%
SLYV
8.2%

Energy

SLYG
3.8%
SLYV
7.3%

Consumer Defensive

SLYG
3.3%
SLYV
5.7%

Basic Materials

SLYG
3.1%
SLYV
5.7%

Communication Services

SLYG
2.7%
SLYV
3.8%

Utilities

SLYG
1.6%
SLYV
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLYG vs. SLYV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SLYG
SLYG Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
SLYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLYG Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
SLYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLYG Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

SLYV
SLYV Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
SLYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLYV Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
SLYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLYV Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SLYG vs. SLYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SLYGSLYVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.37

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.33

3.96

-0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.35

13.69

-2.34

SLYG vs. SLYV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLYG Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the SLYV Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLYG and SLYV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SLYG vs. SLYV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLYG drawdown since its inception was -62.92%, roughly equal to the maximum SLYV drawdown of -61.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLYG and SLYV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLYGSLYVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.92%

-61.15%

-1.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.10%

-9.36%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.39%

-28.68%

+1.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.18%

-28.68%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.86%

-47.73%

+5.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.28%

-1.54%

-1.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.83%

-8.89%

-5.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

2.71%

-0.04%

Volatility

SLYG vs. SLYV - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) has a higher volatility of 4.06% compared to SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) at 3.53%. This indicates that SLYG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLYGSLYVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.06%

3.53%

+0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.90%

11.08%

+1.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.83%

17.69%

+0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.49%

21.69%

-0.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.72%

23.89%

-1.17%

SLYG vs. SLYV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SLYG and SLYV have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SLYG vs. SLYV - Dividend Comparison

SLYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, less than SLYV's 1.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SLYG
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF
0.66%0.86%1.22%1.18%1.18%0.68%0.71%1.08%1.06%4.74%1.13%5.75%
SLYV
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF
1.82%2.02%2.30%2.11%1.47%1.94%1.40%1.67%2.14%5.53%2.18%6.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


SLYG and SLYV have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLYG has higher volatility (4.06%) compared to SLYV (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLYG dropped -62.92% vs SLYV's -61.15%.

On 10-year performance, SLYG leads with 11.13% vs 10.28% for SLYV. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, SLYV has been the lower-risk option at 3.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SLYG has performed better with a 11.13% return vs 10.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SLYG and SLYV have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

SLYV has the higher dividend yield at 1.82%, compared with 0.66% for SLYG.

SLYG is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while SLYV is Small Cap Value Equities. SLYG tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index, while SLYV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index.

SLYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLYG and SLYV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer