SLYG vs. SLYV
SLYG (SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF) and SLYV (SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SLYG is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index, while SLYV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SLYG returned 11.75%/yr vs 10.63%/yr for SLYV. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.
Performance
SLYG vs. SLYV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLYG achieves a 21.87% return, which is significantly higher than SLYV's 17.70% return. Over the past 10 years, SLYG has outperformed SLYV with an annualized return of 11.75%, while SLYV has yielded a comparatively lower 10.63% annualized return.
SLYG
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 6.00%
- YTD
- 21.87%
- 6M
- 17.87%
- 1Y
- 34.08%
- 3Y*
- 16.89%
- 5Y*
- 6.59%
- 10Y*
- 11.75%
SLYV
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 3.12%
- YTD
- 17.70%
- 6M
- 15.50%
- 1Y
- 39.46%
- 3Y*
- 15.47%
- 5Y*
- 6.55%
- 10Y*
- 10.63%
SLYG vs. SLYV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLYG SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF | 21.87% | 5.20% | 9.38% | 17.27% | -21.26% | 22.42% | 19.48% | 20.97% | -4.20% | 14.62% |
SLYV SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF | 17.70% | 6.54% | 7.28% | 14.82% | -11.08% | 30.57% | 2.68% | 24.26% | -12.77% | 11.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLYG and SLYV is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2000 | 0.88 |
The correlation between SLYG and SLYV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
SLYG vs. SLYV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SLYG
SLYV
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Utilities
Technology
SLYG
SLYV
Industrials
SLYG
SLYV
Healthcare
SLYG
SLYV
Financial Services
SLYG
SLYV
Consumer Cyclical
SLYG
SLYV
Real Estate
SLYG
SLYV
Energy
SLYG
SLYV
Consumer Defensive
SLYG
SLYV
Communication Services
SLYG
SLYV
Basic Materials
SLYG
SLYV
Utilities
SLYG
SLYV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLYG vs. SLYV — Risk / Return Rank
SLYG
SLYV
SLYG vs. SLYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLYG | SLYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.37 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.76 | 4.24 | -0.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.24 | 14.05 | -0.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLYG vs. SLYV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLYG drawdown since its inception was -62.92%, roughly equal to the maximum SLYV drawdown of -61.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLYG and SLYV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLYG | SLYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.92% | -61.15% | -1.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.10% | -9.36% | +0.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.39% | -28.68% | +1.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.18% | -28.68% | -0.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.86% | -47.73% | +5.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.48% | +1.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.88% | -8.93% | -5.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | 2.82% | -0.24% |
Volatility
SLYG vs. SLYV - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) has a higher volatility of 5.21% compared to SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) at 4.75%. This indicates that SLYG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLYG | SLYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.21% | 4.75% | +0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.96% | 11.73% | +1.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.96% | 18.31% | -0.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.56% | 21.91% | -0.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.77% | 23.98% | -1.21% |
SLYG vs. SLYV - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SLYG and SLYV have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SLYG vs. SLYV - Dividend Comparison
SLYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than SLYV's 2.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLYG SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF | 0.88% | 0.86% | 1.22% | 1.18% | 1.18% | 0.68% | 0.71% | 1.08% | 1.06% | 4.74% | 1.13% | 5.75% |
SLYV SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF | 2.28% | 2.02% | 2.30% | 2.11% | 1.47% | 1.94% | 1.40% | 1.67% | 2.14% | 5.53% | 2.18% | 6.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, SLYG and SLYV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SLYG has higher volatility (5.21%) compared to SLYV (4.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLYG dropped -62.92% vs SLYV's -61.15%.
On 10-year performance, SLYG leads with 11.75% vs 10.63% for SLYV. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, SLYV has been the lower-risk option at 4.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SLYG has performed better with a 11.75% return vs 10.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SLYG and SLYV have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.
SLYV has the higher dividend yield at 2.28%, compared with 0.88% for SLYG.
SLYG is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while SLYV is Small Cap Value Equities. SLYG tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index, while SLYV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index.
SLYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLYG and SLYV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer