PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLYG vs. SLYV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLYG vs. SLYV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLYG achieves a 21.87% return, which is significantly higher than SLYV's 17.70% return. Over the past 10 years, SLYG has outperformed SLYV with an annualized return of 11.75%, while SLYV has yielded a comparatively lower 10.63% annualized return.


SLYG

1D
0.35%
1M
6.00%
YTD
21.87%
6M
17.87%
1Y
34.08%
3Y*
16.89%
5Y*
6.59%
10Y*
11.75%

SLYV

1D
-0.20%
1M
3.12%
YTD
17.70%
6M
15.50%
1Y
39.46%
3Y*
15.47%
5Y*
6.55%
10Y*
10.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLYG vs. SLYV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SLYG
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF
21.87%5.20%9.38%17.27%-21.26%22.42%19.48%20.97%-4.20%14.62%
SLYV
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF
17.70%6.54%7.28%14.82%-11.08%30.57%2.68%24.26%-12.77%11.74%

Correlation

The correlation between SLYG and SLYV is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2000

0.88

The correlation between SLYG and SLYV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

SLYG vs. SLYV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SLYG
SLYV

Technology

19.9%
13.4%

Industrials

18.9%
11.6%

Healthcare

15.1%
7.3%

Financial Services

13.6%
19.5%

Consumer Cyclical

11.0%
15.4%

Real Estate

6.3%
8.6%

Energy

4.6%
7.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.0%
3.8%

Communication Services

2.9%
4.4%

Basic Materials

2.8%
6.9%

Utilities

1.8%
2.1%

Technology

SLYG
19.9%
SLYV
13.4%

Industrials

SLYG
18.9%
SLYV
11.6%

Healthcare

SLYG
15.1%
SLYV
7.3%

Financial Services

SLYG
13.6%
SLYV
19.5%

Consumer Cyclical

SLYG
11.0%
SLYV
15.4%

Real Estate

SLYG
6.3%
SLYV
8.6%

Energy

SLYG
4.6%
SLYV
7.0%

Consumer Defensive

SLYG
3.0%
SLYV
3.8%

Communication Services

SLYG
2.9%
SLYV
4.4%

Basic Materials

SLYG
2.8%
SLYV
6.9%

Utilities

SLYG
1.8%
SLYV
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLYG vs. SLYV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLYG
SLYG Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SLYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLYG Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
SLYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLYG Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

SLYV
SLYV Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SLYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLYV Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
SLYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLYV Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLYG vs. SLYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SLYGSLYVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.37

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.76

4.24

-0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.24

14.05

-0.81

SLYG vs. SLYV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLYG Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the SLYV Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLYG and SLYV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SLYG vs. SLYV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLYG drawdown since its inception was -62.92%, roughly equal to the maximum SLYV drawdown of -61.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLYG and SLYV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLYGSLYVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.92%

-61.15%

-1.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.10%

-9.36%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.39%

-28.68%

+1.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.18%

-28.68%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.86%

-47.73%

+5.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.48%

+1.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.88%

-8.93%

-5.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.58%

2.82%

-0.24%

Volatility

SLYG vs. SLYV - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) has a higher volatility of 5.21% compared to SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) at 4.75%. This indicates that SLYG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLYGSLYVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.21%

4.75%

+0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.96%

11.73%

+1.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.96%

18.31%

-0.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.56%

21.91%

-0.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.77%

23.98%

-1.21%

SLYG vs. SLYV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SLYG and SLYV have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SLYG vs. SLYV - Dividend Comparison

SLYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than SLYV's 2.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SLYG
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF
0.88%0.86%1.22%1.18%1.18%0.68%0.71%1.08%1.06%4.74%1.13%5.75%
SLYV
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF
2.28%2.02%2.30%2.11%1.47%1.94%1.40%1.67%2.14%5.53%2.18%6.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, SLYG and SLYV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SLYG has higher volatility (5.21%) compared to SLYV (4.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLYG dropped -62.92% vs SLYV's -61.15%.

On 10-year performance, SLYG leads with 11.75% vs 10.63% for SLYV. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, SLYV has been the lower-risk option at 4.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SLYG has performed better with a 11.75% return vs 10.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SLYG and SLYV have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

SLYV has the higher dividend yield at 2.28%, compared with 0.88% for SLYG.

SLYG is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while SLYV is Small Cap Value Equities. SLYG tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index, while SLYV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index.

SLYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLYG and SLYV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer