SLTY vs. FVAL

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

SLTY (YieldMax Ultra Short Option Income Strategy ETF) and FVAL (Fidelity Value Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SLTY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while FVAL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Fidelity U.S. Value Factor Index. SLTY is actively managed, while FVAL is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.63, they often move in opposite directions. SLTY charges 1.24%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FVAL.

Performance

SLTY vs. FVAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Ultra Short Option Income Strategy ETF (SLTY) and Fidelity Value Factor ETF (FVAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLTY achieves a -7.07% return, which is significantly lower than FVAL's 7.42% return.

SLTY

• 1D: -2.48%
• 1M: -1.42%
• YTD: -7.07%
• 6M: -5.75%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FVAL

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: -1.68%
• YTD: 7.42%
• 6M: 6.04%
• 1Y: 24.56%
• 3Y*: 19.14%
• 5Y*: 11.87%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLTY vs. FVAL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SLTY YieldMax Ultra Short Option Income Strategy ETF	-7.07%	-12.61%
FVAL Fidelity Value Factor ETF	7.42%	10.18%

Correlation

The correlation between SLTY and FVAL is -0.63, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025	-0.63

Return for Risk

SLTY vs. FVAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLTY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FVAL

FVAL Risk / Return Rank: 69
FVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
FVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
FVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 70
FVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
FVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLTY vs. FVAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Ultra Short Option Income Strategy ETF (SLTY) and Fidelity Value Factor ETF (FVAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SLTY	FVAL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.06	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.85	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.37	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.76	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	11.66	—

Drawdowns

SLTY vs. FVAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLTY drawdown since its inception was -21.27%, smaller than the maximum FVAL drawdown of -37.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLTY and FVAL.

Drawdown Indicators

	SLTY	FVAL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.27%	-37.26%	+15.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.92%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.39%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-23.42%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.80%	-4.07%	-14.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.35%	-4.57%	-9.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.11%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SLTY	FVAL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.26%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.33%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.26%	12.00%	+6.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.26%	16.53%	+1.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.26%	18.10%	+0.16%

SLTY vs. FVAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLTY has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than FVAL's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

SLTY vs. FVAL - Dividend Comparison

SLTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 79.09%, more than FVAL's 1.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FVAL Fidelity Value Factor ETF	1.63%	1.61%	1.60%	1.69%	1.79%	1.41%	1.61%	1.77%	2.06%	1.62%	0.45%
SLTY YieldMax Ultra Short Option Income Strategy ETF	79.09%	29.68%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SLTY and FVAL in my portfolio?

SLTY and FVAL have a correlation of -0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SLTY or FVAL?

On fees, FVAL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SLTY or FVAL?

FVAL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.24% for SLTY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SLTY or FVAL?

SLTY has the higher dividend yield at 79.09%, compared with 1.63% for FVAL.

What is the main difference between SLTY and FVAL?

SLTY is categorized as Derivative Income, while FVAL is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 1.24% for SLTY and 0.15% for FVAL.