SLTY vs. QQQI

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

SLTY (YieldMax Ultra Short Option Income Strategy ETF) and QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SLTY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while QQQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Neos. Both are actively managed. Their -0.50 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. SLTY charges 1.24%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for QQQI.

Performance

SLTY vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Ultra Short Option Income Strategy ETF (SLTY) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLTY achieves a -6.99% return, which is significantly lower than QQQI's 8.51% return.

SLTY

• 1D: -1.66%
• 1M: 0.67%
• 6M: 1.02%
• YTD: -6.99%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

QQQI

• 1D: 1.51%
• 1M: -1.62%
• 6M: 6.55%
• YTD: 8.51%
• 1Y: 19.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 18.71%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	$330.38M	$327.04M	$357.36M
SLTY YieldMax Ultra Short Option Income Strategy ETF	$339.87K	$363.68K	$505.95K

SLTY vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SLTY YieldMax Ultra Short Option Income Strategy ETF	-6.99%	-12.61%
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	8.51%	7.92%

Correlation

The correlation between SLTY and QQQI is -0.50, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025	-0.50

Return for Risk

SLTY vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SLTY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QQQI

QQQI Risk / Return Rank: 52
QQQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
QQQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
QQQI Omega Ratio Rank: 48
QQQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
QQQI Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SLTY vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Ultra Short Option Income Strategy ETF (SLTY) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SLTY	QQQI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.21	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.71	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.22	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.06	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	7.38	—

Drawdowns

SLTY vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLTY drawdown since its inception was -21.27%, which is greater than QQQI's maximum drawdown of -20.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLTY and QQQI.

Drawdown Indicators

	SLTY	QQQI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.27%	-20.00%	-1.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.61%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.72%	-4.50%	-14.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.82%	-2.28%	-12.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.68%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SLTY	QQQI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.60%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	13.71%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.58%	16.35%	+1.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.58%	17.76%	-0.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.58%	17.76%	-0.18%

SLTY vs. QQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLTY has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQI's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

SLTY vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison

SLTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 91.13%, more than QQQI's 14.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	14.16%	13.82%	12.85%
SLTY YieldMax Ultra Short Option Income Strategy ETF	91.13%	29.68%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SLTY and QQQI in my portfolio?

SLTY and QQQI have a correlation of -0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SLTY or QQQI?

On fees, QQQI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SLTY or QQQI?

QQQI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 1.24% for SLTY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SLTY or QQQI?

SLTY has the higher dividend yield at 91.13%, compared with 14.16% for QQQI.

What is the main difference between SLTY and QQQI?

SLTY is categorized as Derivative Income, while QQQI is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Neos. Their fees differ too: 1.24% for SLTY and 0.68% for QQQI.