PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLP vs. PECO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SLP vs. PECO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simulations Plus, Inc. (SLP) and Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SLP

1D
-0.38%
1M
-0.87%
6M
7.93%
YTD
0.00%
1Y
42.42%
3Y*
-28.74%
5Y*
-17.04%
10Y*
9.36%
ALL TIME*
10.22%

PECO

1D
0.12%
1M
1.28%
6M
19.21%
YTD
21.80%
1Y
31.23%
3Y*
9.87%
5Y*
12.47%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$41.05M$36.52M$42.62M
$10.86M$8.86M$8.44M

SLP vs. PECO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SLP
Simulations Plus, Inc.
0.00%-34.64%-37.40%23.09%-22.28%6.52%
PECO
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.
21.80%-1.59%6.20%18.53%-0.33%19.67%

Correlation

The correlation between SLP and PECO is -0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2021

0.20

The correlation between SLP and PECO shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.20 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SLP:

$368.70M

PECO:

$5.46B

EPS

SLP:

$0.40

PECO:

$1.48

PE Ratio

SLP:

45.45

PECO:

28.75

PEG Ratio

SLP:

129.24

PECO:

0.42

PS Ratio

SLP:

4.49

PECO:

5.50

Total Revenue (TTM)

SLP:

$82.06M

PECO:

$750.89M

Gross Profit (TTM)

SLP:

$52.01M

PECO:

$533.12M

EBITDA (TTM)

SLP:

$13.91M

PECO:

$411.50M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLP vs. PECO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SLP
SLP Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLP Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
SLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLP Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

PECO
PECO Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
PECO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PECO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
PECO Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
PECO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
PECO Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SLP vs. PECO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simulations Plus, Inc. (SLP) and Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SLPPECODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.33

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.88

3.92

-3.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.82

9.98

-8.16

SLP vs. PECO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLP Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the PECO Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLP and PECO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SLP vs. PECO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLP drawdown since its inception was -90.32%, which is greater than PECO's maximum drawdown of -23.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLP and PECO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLPPECODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.32%

-23.11%

-67.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-45.49%

-7.74%

-37.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-77.81%

-15.78%

-62.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-82.81%

-23.11%

-59.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-87.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-79.24%

-3.45%

-75.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.33%

-6.34%

-39.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.01%

3.04%

+18.97%

Volatility

SLP vs. PECO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Simulations Plus, Inc. (SLP) is 1.11%, while Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) has a volatility of 5.31%. This indicates that SLP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PECO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLPPECODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.11%

5.31%

-4.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.00%

11.85%

+23.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.49%

15.63%

+33.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.66%

22.48%

+28.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.32%

22.48%

+25.84%

Dividends

SLP vs. PECO - Dividend Comparison

SLP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PECO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PECO
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.
3.04%3.52%3.18%3.12%3.43%1.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SLP
Simulations Plus, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.65%0.54%0.66%0.51%0.33%0.83%1.21%1.30%2.07%2.02%

Financials

SLP vs. PECO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Simulations Plus, Inc. and Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


SLP and PECO have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PECO has higher volatility (5.31%) compared to SLP (1.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLP dropped -90.32% vs PECO's -23.11%.

PECO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLP and PECO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer