SLP vs. PECO
SLP (Simulations Plus, Inc.) and PECO (Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.) are both stocks. SLP operates in Health Information Services (Healthcare), while PECO operates in REIT - Retail (Real Estate). Over the past 3 years, SLP returned -26.01%/yr vs 10.74%/yr for PECO. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SLP vs. PECO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLP achieves a 0.05% return, which is significantly lower than PECO's 19.72% return.
SLP
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 11.76%
- 6M
- -6.94%
- YTD
- 0.05%
- 1Y
- 7.55%
- 3Y*
- -26.01%
- 5Y*
- -19.01%
- 10Y*
- 9.47%
PECO
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- -0.00%
- 6M
- 22.30%
- YTD
- 19.72%
- 1Y
- 25.40%
- 3Y*
- 10.74%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SLP vs. PECO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLP Simulations Plus, Inc. | 0.05% | -34.64% | -37.40% | 23.09% | -22.28% | 6.52% |
PECO Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. | 19.72% | -1.59% | 6.20% | 18.53% | -0.33% | 19.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLP and PECO is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2021 | 0.20 |
The correlation between SLP and PECO shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SLP:
$368.75M
PECO:
$5.27B
SLP:
$0.40
PECO:
$1.31
SLP:
45.47
PECO:
31.93
SLP:
129.32
PECO:
0.46
SLP:
4.49
PECO:
4.98
SLP:
$82.06M
PECO:
$739.02M
SLP:
$52.01M
PECO:
$525.25M
SLP:
$13.91M
PECO:
$502.64M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLP vs. PECO — Risk / Return Rank
SLP
PECO
SLP vs. PECO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simulations Plus, Inc. (SLP) and Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLP | PECO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.28 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.08 | 3.32 | -3.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.16 | 8.13 | -7.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLP vs. PECO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLP drawdown since its inception was -90.32%, which is greater than PECO's maximum drawdown of -23.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLP and PECO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLP | PECO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.32% | -23.11% | -67.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.49% | -7.74% | -37.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -77.81% | -15.78% | -62.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -82.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -87.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.23% | -1.11% | -78.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.26% | -6.40% | -39.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.90% | 3.15% | +20.75% |
Volatility
SLP vs. PECO - Volatility Comparison
Simulations Plus, Inc. (SLP) has a higher volatility of 11.43% compared to Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) at 4.64%. This indicates that SLP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PECO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLP | PECO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.43% | 4.64% | +6.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.87% | 11.42% | +26.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.63% | 15.61% | +41.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.40% | 22.51% | +28.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.42% | 22.51% | +25.91% |
Dividends
SLP vs. PECO - Dividend Comparison
SLP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PECO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PECO Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. | 3.08% | 3.52% | 3.18% | 3.12% | 3.43% | 1.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SLP Simulations Plus, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.65% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.51% | 0.33% | 0.83% | 1.21% | 1.30% | 2.07% | 2.02% |
Financials
SLP vs. PECO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Simulations Plus, Inc. and Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SLP vs. PECO - Profitability Comparison
SLP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Simulations Plus, Inc. reported a gross profit of 15.13M and revenue of 21.89M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.1%.
PECO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. reported a gross profit of 135.68M and revenue of 190.74M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.1%.
SLP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Simulations Plus, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.50M and revenue of 21.89M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.6%.
PECO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. reported an operating income of 58.21M and revenue of 190.74M, resulting in an operating margin of 30.5%.
SLP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Simulations Plus, Inc. reported a net income of 3.58M and revenue of 21.89M, resulting in a net margin of 16.3%.
PECO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. reported a net income of 30.38M and revenue of 190.74M, resulting in a net margin of 15.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SLP and PECO have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLP has higher volatility (11.43%) compared to PECO (4.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLP dropped -90.32% vs PECO's -23.11%.
PECO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLP and PECO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer