PECO vs. KRG
PECO (Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.) and KRG (Kite Realty Group Trust) are both stocks. Both operate in the REIT - Retail industry within the Real Estate sector. Over the past 3 years, PECO returned 13.05%/yr vs 15.93%/yr for KRG. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
PECO vs. KRG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PECO achieves a 12.17% return, which is significantly lower than KRG's 15.98% return.
PECO
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -1.08%
- YTD
- 12.17%
- 6M
- 14.44%
- 1Y
- 13.38%
- 3Y*
- 13.05%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KRG
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 2.47%
- YTD
- 15.98%
- 6M
- 23.07%
- 1Y
- 29.00%
- 3Y*
- 15.93%
- 5Y*
- 9.01%
- 10Y*
- 5.27%
PECO vs. KRG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PECO Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. | 12.17% | -1.59% | 6.20% | 18.53% | -0.33% | 20.40% |
KRG Kite Realty Group Trust | 15.98% | -0.20% | 15.46% | 13.60% | 0.80% | 3.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between PECO and KRG is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2021 | 0.73 |
The correlation between PECO and KRG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
PECO:
$1.15
KRG:
$1.33
PECO:
34.33
KRG:
20.27
PECO:
0.50
KRG:
0.01
PECO:
5.36
KRG:
7.02
PECO:
$739.02M
KRG:
$826.57M
PECO:
$525.25M
KRG:
$431.97M
PECO:
$502.64M
KRG:
$719.77M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PECO vs. KRG — Risk / Return Rank
PECO
KRG
PECO vs. KRG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) and Kite Realty Group Trust (KRG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PECO | KRG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.88 | 1.53 | -0.65 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.41 | 2.17 | -0.77 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.27 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.80 | 3.10 | -1.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.15 | 8.91 | -4.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PECO | KRG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | 1.53 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.14 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.06 | +0.43 |
Drawdowns
PECO vs. KRG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PECO drawdown since its inception was -23.11%, smaller than the maximum KRG drawdown of -88.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PECO and KRG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PECO | KRG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.11% | -88.63% | +65.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.30% | -9.27% | +0.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.78% | -29.07% | +13.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -68.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.72% | -9.38% | +5.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.51% | -46.01% | +39.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.60% | 3.23% | +0.37% |
Volatility
PECO vs. KRG - Volatility Comparison
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) has a higher volatility of 4.56% compared to Kite Realty Group Trust (KRG) at 4.27%. This indicates that PECO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KRG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PECO | KRG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.56% | 4.27% | +0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.67% | 12.23% | -1.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.30% | 19.04% | -3.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.58% | 27.10% | -4.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.58% | 36.86% | -14.28% |
Dividends
PECO vs. KRG - Dividend Comparison
PECO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, less than KRG's 4.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KRG Kite Realty Group Trust | 4.69% | 4.51% | 4.00% | 4.20% | 3.90% | 3.12% | 3.00% | 8.13% | 9.01% | 6.17% | 4.83% | 4.16% |
PECO Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. | 3.26% | 3.52% | 3.18% | 3.12% | 3.43% | 1.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
PECO vs. KRG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. and Kite Realty Group Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PECO vs. KRG - Profitability Comparison
PECO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. reported a gross profit of 135.68M and revenue of 190.74M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.1%.
KRG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kite Realty Group Trust reported a gross profit of 144.76M and revenue of 200.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 72.1%.
PECO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. reported an operating income of 58.21M and revenue of 190.74M, resulting in an operating margin of 30.5%.
KRG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kite Realty Group Trust reported an operating income of 130.81M and revenue of 200.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 65.2%.
PECO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. reported a net income of 30.38M and revenue of 190.74M, resulting in a net margin of 15.9%.
KRG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kite Realty Group Trust reported a net income of 11.39M and revenue of 200.70M, resulting in a net margin of 5.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PECO and KRG have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PECO has higher volatility (4.56%) compared to KRG (4.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PECO dropped -23.11% vs KRG's -88.63%.
KRG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PECO and KRG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer