PortfoliosLab logo
PECO vs. CLDT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between PECO and CLDT is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

PECO vs. CLDT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) and Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PECO:

0.78

CLDT:

-0.51

Sortino Ratio

PECO:

1.23

CLDT:

-0.53

Omega Ratio

PECO:

1.15

CLDT:

0.93

Calmar Ratio

PECO:

0.97

CLDT:

-0.23

Martin Ratio

PECO:

2.52

CLDT:

-1.15

Ulcer Index

PECO:

6.07%

CLDT:

14.39%

Daily Std Dev

PECO:

19.34%

CLDT:

33.42%

Max Drawdown

PECO:

-23.11%

CLDT:

-83.52%

Current Drawdown

PECO:

-7.28%

CLDT:

-65.64%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PECO:

$5.02B

CLDT:

$369.22M

EPS

PECO:

$0.58

CLDT:

$0.06

PE Ratio

PECO:

62.55

CLDT:

120.83

PS Ratio

PECO:

7.40

CLDT:

1.17

PB Ratio

PECO:

1.97

CLDT:

0.47

Total Revenue (TTM)

PECO:

$678.99M

CLDT:

$317.40M

Gross Profit (TTM)

PECO:

$421.87M

CLDT:

$103.34M

EBITDA (TTM)

PECO:

$434.50M

CLDT:

$99.19M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PECO achieves a -1.75% return, which is significantly higher than CLDT's -17.97% return.


PECO

YTD

-1.75%

1M

0.56%

6M

-5.40%

1Y

15.12%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

CLDT

YTD

-17.97%

1M

6.46%

6M

-16.49%

1Y

-16.59%

5Y*

5.16%

10Y*

-9.34%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

PECO vs. CLDT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PECO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PECO is 7575
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PECO is 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PECO is 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PECO is 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PECO is 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PECO is 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

CLDT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CLDT is 2424
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CLDT is 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CLDT is 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CLDT is 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CLDT is 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CLDT is 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PECO vs. CLDT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) and Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current PECO Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is higher than the CLDT Sharpe Ratio of -0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PECO and CLDT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

PECO vs. CLDT - Dividend Comparison

PECO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, less than CLDT's 4.14% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
PECO
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.
3.35%3.18%3.12%3.43%1.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CLDT
Chatham Lodging Trust
4.14%3.13%2.61%0.57%0.00%2.04%7.20%7.47%5.80%6.72%5.86%3.21%

Drawdowns

PECO vs. CLDT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PECO drawdown since its inception was -23.11%, smaller than the maximum CLDT drawdown of -83.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PECO and CLDT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

PECO vs. CLDT - Volatility Comparison

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) and Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT) have volatilities of 6.23% and 5.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

PECO vs. CLDT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. and Chatham Lodging Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


50.00M100.00M150.00M20212022202320242025
178.31M
68.64M
(PECO) Total Revenue
(CLDT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PECO vs. CLDT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. and Chatham Lodging Trust over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20212022202320242025
71.4%
30.4%
(PECO) Gross Margin
(CLDT) Gross Margin
PECO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. reported a gross profit of 127.30M and revenue of 178.31M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.4%.

CLDT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Chatham Lodging Trust reported a gross profit of 20.84M and revenue of 68.64M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.4%.

PECO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. reported an operating income of 49.94M and revenue of 178.31M, resulting in an operating margin of 28.0%.

CLDT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Chatham Lodging Trust reported an operating income of 8.31M and revenue of 68.64M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.1%.

PECO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. reported a net income of 26.31M and revenue of 178.31M, resulting in a net margin of 14.8%.

CLDT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Chatham Lodging Trust reported a net income of 1.54M and revenue of 68.64M, resulting in a net margin of 2.2%.