PECO vs. CLDT
Compare and contrast key facts about Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) and Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT).
Performance
PECO vs. CLDT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PECO vs. CLDT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PECO Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. | 6.13% | -1.59% | 6.20% | 18.53% | -0.33% | 20.40% |
CLDT Chatham Lodging Trust | 17.06% | -19.89% | -13.83% | -10.13% | -10.05% | 10.91% |
Fundamentals
PECO:
$5.20B
CLDT:
$386.47M
PECO:
$0.79
CLDT:
$0.30
PECO:
47.34
CLDT:
25.83
PECO:
6.29
CLDT:
1.32
PECO:
2.27
CLDT:
0.52
PECO:
$838.41M
CLDT:
$295.08M
PECO:
$516.86M
CLDT:
$10.38M
PECO:
$465.22M
CLDT:
$92.81M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PECO achieves a 6.13% return, which is significantly lower than CLDT's 17.06% return.
PECO
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -4.46%
- YTD
- 6.13%
- 6M
- 11.00%
- 1Y
- 6.30%
- 3Y*
- 8.36%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CLDT
- 1D
- 1.81%
- 1M
- 3.40%
- YTD
- 17.06%
- 6M
- 20.37%
- 1Y
- 16.25%
- 3Y*
- -5.51%
- 5Y*
- -8.04%
- 10Y*
- -5.53%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PECO vs. CLDT — Risk / Return Rank
PECO
CLDT
PECO vs. CLDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) and Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PECO | CLDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.36 | 0.51 | -0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.65 | 1.00 | -0.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.12 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.75 | 0.87 | -0.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.52 | 1.90 | -0.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PECO | CLDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 | 0.51 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.13 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | -0.05 | +0.49 |
Correlation
The correlation between PECO and CLDT is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PECO vs. CLDT - Dividend Comparison
PECO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, less than CLDT's 4.70% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PECO Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. | 3.40% | 3.52% | 3.18% | 3.12% | 3.43% | 1.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CLDT Chatham Lodging Trust | 4.70% | 5.29% | 3.13% | 2.61% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 2.04% | 7.20% | 7.47% | 5.80% | 6.72% | 5.86% |
Drawdowns
PECO vs. CLDT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PECO drawdown since its inception was -23.11%, smaller than the maximum CLDT drawdown of -83.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PECO and CLDT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PECO | CLDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.11% | -83.52% | +60.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.46% | -18.75% | +8.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -55.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -81.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.64% | -60.72% | +55.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.68% | -33.13% | +26.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.17% | 8.57% | -3.40% |
Volatility
PECO vs. CLDT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) is 3.05%, while Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT) has a volatility of 12.08%. This indicates that PECO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PECO | CLDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.05% | 12.08% | -9.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.57% | 20.47% | -10.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.51% | 31.84% | -14.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.76% | 32.91% | -10.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.76% | 42.89% | -20.13% |
Financials
PECO vs. CLDT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. and Chatham Lodging Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities