PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
PECO vs. CLDT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


PECOCLDT
YTD Return11.20%-11.83%
1Y Return21.47%0.14%
3Y Return (Ann)9.15%-8.96%
Sharpe Ratio1.220.03
Sortino Ratio1.810.27
Omega Ratio1.231.03
Calmar Ratio1.510.01
Martin Ratio3.390.05
Ulcer Index7.00%16.51%
Daily Std Dev19.44%29.88%
Max Drawdown-23.11%-83.52%
Current Drawdown0.00%-57.15%

Fundamentals


PECOCLDT
Market Cap$5.37B$466.10M
EPS$0.47-$0.22
Total Revenue (TTM)$645.18M$314.38M
Gross Profit (TTM)$279.24M$146.07M
EBITDA (TTM)$410.63M$73.43M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between PECO and CLDT is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

PECO vs. CLDT - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, PECO achieves a 11.20% return, which is significantly higher than CLDT's -11.83% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
22.87%
4.18%
PECO
CLDT

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

PECO vs. CLDT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) and Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PECO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PECO, currently valued at 1.22, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.22
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for PECO, currently valued at 1.81, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.81
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for PECO, currently valued at 1.23, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.23
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PECO, currently valued at 1.51, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.51
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for PECO, currently valued at 3.39, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.003.39
CLDT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CLDT, currently valued at 0.03, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.03
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CLDT, currently valued at 0.27, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.27
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CLDT, currently valued at 1.03, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.03
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CLDT, currently valued at 0.02, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.02
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CLDT, currently valued at 0.05, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.000.05

PECO vs. CLDT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PECO Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is higher than the CLDT Sharpe Ratio of 0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PECO and CLDT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.22
0.03
PECO
CLDT

Dividends

PECO vs. CLDT - Dividend Comparison

PECO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, less than CLDT's 3.03% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
PECO
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.
2.99%3.12%3.43%1.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CLDT
Chatham Lodging Trust
3.03%2.61%0.57%0.00%2.04%7.20%7.47%5.80%6.72%5.86%3.21%4.11%

Drawdowns

PECO vs. CLDT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PECO drawdown since its inception was -23.11%, smaller than the maximum CLDT drawdown of -83.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PECO and CLDT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember0
-34.63%
PECO
CLDT

Volatility

PECO vs. CLDT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) is 4.57%, while Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT) has a volatility of 12.93%. This indicates that PECO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
4.57%
12.93%
PECO
CLDT

Financials

PECO vs. CLDT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. and Chatham Lodging Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items