PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PECO vs. MAC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PECO vs. MAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) and Macerich Company (MAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PECO achieves a 11.17% return, which is significantly lower than MAC's 21.91% return.


PECO

1D
-0.89%
1M
-1.55%
YTD
11.17%
6M
13.75%
1Y
13.47%
3Y*
12.71%
5Y*
10Y*

MAC

1D
0.27%
1M
3.72%
YTD
21.91%
6M
30.22%
1Y
44.89%
3Y*
35.21%
5Y*
10.15%
10Y*
-6.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PECO vs. MAC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PECO
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.
11.17%-1.59%6.20%18.53%-0.33%20.40%
MAC
Macerich Company
21.91%-3.72%34.48%45.69%-31.57%-0.24%

Correlation

The correlation between PECO and MAC is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2021

0.57

The correlation between PECO and MAC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

EPS

PECO:

$1.15

MAC:

-$0.72

PS Ratio

PECO:

5.31

MAC:

5.65

Total Revenue (TTM)

PECO:

$739.02M

MAC:

$1.01B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PECO:

$525.25M

MAC:

$483.14M

EBITDA (TTM)

PECO:

$502.64M

MAC:

$669.55M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PECO vs. MAC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PECO
PECO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
PECO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PECO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
PECO Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
PECO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
PECO Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

MAC
MAC Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
MAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAC Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
MAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAC Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PECO vs. MAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) and Macerich Company (MAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PECOMACDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.25

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

3.52

-1.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.74

9.20

-5.45

PECO vs. MAC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PECO Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the MAC Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PECO and MAC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PECOMACDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

1.50

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.16

+0.32

Drawdowns

PECO vs. MAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PECO drawdown since its inception was -23.11%, smaller than the maximum MAC drawdown of -93.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PECO and MAC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PECOMACDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.11%

-93.29%

+70.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.30%

-12.80%

+4.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.78%

-39.56%

+23.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-92.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.58%

-57.74%

+53.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.51%

-29.55%

+23.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.61%

4.89%

-1.28%

Volatility

PECO vs. MAC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) is 4.63%, while Macerich Company (MAC) has a volatility of 8.53%. This indicates that PECO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PECOMACDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.63%

8.53%

-3.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.68%

20.73%

-10.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.27%

30.09%

-14.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.58%

41.13%

-18.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.58%

48.73%

-26.15%

Dividends

PECO vs. MAC - Dividend Comparison

PECO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, more than MAC's 2.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MAC
Macerich Company
2.29%3.68%3.41%4.41%5.51%3.47%10.78%11.14%6.86%4.37%3.88%5.74%
PECO
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.
3.29%3.52%3.18%3.12%3.43%1.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

PECO vs. MAC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. and Macerich Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


150.00M200.00M250.00M20222023202420252026
190.74M
241.54M
(PECO) Total Revenue
(MAC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PECO vs. MAC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. and Macerich Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
71.1%
94.3%
Portfolio components
PECO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. reported a gross profit of 135.68M and revenue of 190.74M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.1%.

MAC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Macerich Company reported a gross profit of 227.73M and revenue of 241.54M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 94.3%.

PECO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. reported an operating income of 58.21M and revenue of 190.74M, resulting in an operating margin of 30.5%.

MAC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Macerich Company reported an operating income of 158.29M and revenue of 241.54M, resulting in an operating margin of 65.5%.

PECO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. reported a net income of 30.38M and revenue of 190.74M, resulting in a net margin of 15.9%.

MAC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Macerich Company reported a net income of -36.35M and revenue of 241.54M, resulting in a net margin of -15.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PECO and MAC have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MAC has higher volatility (8.53%) compared to PECO (4.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PECO dropped -23.11% vs MAC's -93.29%.

MAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PECO and MAC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer