PECO vs. MAC

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) and Macerich Company (MAC).

Performance

PECO vs. MAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) and Macerich Company (MAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PECO vs. MAC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PECO Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.	6.13%	-1.59%	6.20%	18.53%	-0.33%	20.40%
MAC Macerich Company	3.32%	-3.72%	34.48%	45.69%	-31.57%	-0.24%

Fundamentals

Market Cap PECO : $5.20B MAC : $4.85B
EPS PECO : $0.79 MAC : -$0.77
PS Ratio PECO : 6.29 MAC : 4.75
Total Revenue (TTM) PECO : $838.41M MAC : $1.01B
Gross Profit (TTM) PECO : $516.86M MAC : $967.36M
EBITDA (TTM) PECO : $465.22M MAC : $637.82M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PECO achieves a 6.13% return, which is significantly higher than MAC's 3.32% return.

PECO

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: -4.46%
• YTD: 6.13%
• 6M: 11.00%
• 1Y: 6.30%
• 3Y*: 8.36%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MAC

• 1D: 2.22%
• 1M: -6.82%
• YTD: 3.32%
• 6M: 5.76%
• 1Y: 14.35%
• 3Y*: 26.91%
• 5Y*: 14.63%
• 10Y*: -8.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

PECO vs. MAC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PECO

PECO Risk / Return Rank: 53
PECO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
PECO Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
PECO Omega Ratio Rank: 44
PECO Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
PECO Martin Ratio Rank: 57

MAC

MAC Risk / Return Rank: 54
MAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
MAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
MAC Omega Ratio Rank: 49
MAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
MAC Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PECO vs. MAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) and Macerich Company (MAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PECO	MAC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.36	0.38	-0.02
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.65	0.79	-0.14
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.10	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.75	0.59	+0.16
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.52	1.79	-0.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PECO vs. MAC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PECO Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is comparable to the MAC Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PECO and MAC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PECO	MAC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36	0.38	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.35	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	-0.18	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	0.15	+0.30

Correlation

The correlation between PECO and MAC is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

PECO vs. MAC - Dividend Comparison

PECO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, less than MAC's 3.60% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PECO Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.	3.40%	3.52%	3.18%	3.12%	3.43%	1.33%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MAC Macerich Company	3.60%	3.68%	3.41%	4.41%	5.51%	3.47%	10.78%	11.14%	6.86%	4.37%	3.88%	5.74%

Drawdowns

PECO vs. MAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PECO drawdown since its inception was -23.11%, smaller than the maximum MAC drawdown of -93.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PECO and MAC.

Drawdown Indicators

	PECO	MAC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.11%	-93.29%	+70.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.46%	-25.24%	+14.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-63.71%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-92.91%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.64%	-64.19%	+58.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.68%	-29.39%	+22.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.17%	8.36%	-3.19%

Volatility

PECO vs. MAC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) is 3.05%, while Macerich Company (MAC) has a volatility of 10.60%. This indicates that PECO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PECO	MAC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.05%	10.60%	-7.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.57%	21.43%	-11.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.51%	38.17%	-20.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.76%	41.76%	-19.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.76%	48.67%	-25.91%

Financials