PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLP vs. GDYN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SLP vs. GDYN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simulations Plus, Inc. (SLP) and Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. (GDYN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SLP

1D
-0.38%
1M
-0.87%
6M
7.93%
YTD
0.00%
1Y
42.42%
3Y*
-28.74%
5Y*
-17.04%
10Y*
9.36%
ALL TIME*
10.22%

GDYN

1D
-2.41%
1M
13.14%
6M
-16.69%
YTD
-23.70%
1Y
-13.11%
3Y*
-11.85%
5Y*
-20.02%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-4.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$13.70M$11.12M$15.64M
$10.86M$8.86M$8.44M

SLP vs. GDYN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SLP
Simulations Plus, Inc.
0.00%-34.64%-37.40%23.09%-22.28%-33.93%148.64%47.45%-0.75%
GDYN
Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc.
-23.70%-59.40%66.84%18.81%-70.45%201.35%16.13%12.09%1.89%

Correlation

The correlation between SLP and GDYN is 0.31, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2018

0.27

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SLP:

$368.70M

GDYN:

$576.18M

EPS

SLP:

$0.40

GDYN:

$0.03

PE Ratio

SLP:

45.45

GDYN:

205.48

PS Ratio

SLP:

4.49

GDYN:

1.39

PB Ratio

SLP:

2.65

GDYN:

1.12

Total Revenue (TTM)

SLP:

$82.06M

GDYN:

$422.58M

Gross Profit (TTM)

SLP:

$52.01M

GDYN:

$146.70M

EBITDA (TTM)

SLP:

$13.91M

GDYN:

$16.71M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLP vs. GDYN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SLP
SLP Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLP Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
SLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLP Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

GDYN
GDYN Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
GDYN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDYN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDYN Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
GDYN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDYN Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SLP vs. GDYN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simulations Plus, Inc. (SLP) and Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. (GDYN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SLPGDYNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

0.96

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.88

-0.57

+1.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.82

-1.00

+2.83

SLP vs. GDYN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLP Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is higher than the GDYN Sharpe Ratio of -0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLP and GDYN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SLP vs. GDYN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLP drawdown since its inception was -90.32%, roughly equal to the maximum GDYN drawdown of -87.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLP and GDYN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLPGDYNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.32%

-87.62%

-2.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-45.49%

-48.21%

+2.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-77.81%

-78.34%

+0.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-82.81%

-87.62%

+4.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-87.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-79.24%

-83.63%

+4.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.33%

-45.85%

-0.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.01%

28.55%

-6.54%

Volatility

SLP vs. GDYN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Simulations Plus, Inc. (SLP) is 1.11%, while Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. (GDYN) has a volatility of 15.58%. This indicates that SLP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDYN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLPGDYNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.11%

15.58%

-14.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.00%

43.73%

-8.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.49%

60.34%

-10.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.66%

61.77%

-11.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.32%

56.62%

-8.30%

Dividends

SLP vs. GDYN - Dividend Comparison

Neither SLP nor GDYN has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GDYN
Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SLP
Simulations Plus, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.65%0.54%0.66%0.51%0.33%0.83%1.21%1.30%2.07%2.02%

Financials

SLP vs. GDYN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Simulations Plus, Inc. and Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

SLP vs. GDYN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Simulations Plus, Inc. and Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

SLP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Simulations Plus, Inc. reported a gross profit of 15.13M and revenue of 21.89M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.1%.

GDYN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 39.62M and revenue of 108.16M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.6%.

SLP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Simulations Plus, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.50M and revenue of 21.89M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.6%.

GDYN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.28M and revenue of 108.16M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.2%.

SLP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Simulations Plus, Inc. reported a net income of 3.58M and revenue of 21.89M, resulting in a net margin of 16.3%.

GDYN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 2.85M and revenue of 108.16M, resulting in a net margin of 2.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SLP and GDYN have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDYN has higher volatility (15.58%) compared to SLP (1.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLP dropped -90.32% vs GDYN's -87.62%.

SLP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.81 vs -0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLP and GDYN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer