SLP vs. ACT
SLP (Simulations Plus, Inc.) and ACT (Enact Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. SLP operates in Health Information Services (Healthcare), while ACT operates in Insurance - Specialty (Financial Services). Over the past 3 years, SLP returned -26.01%/yr vs 23.63%/yr for ACT. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SLP vs. ACT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLP achieves a 0.05% return, which is significantly lower than ACT's 14.10% return.
SLP
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 11.76%
- 6M
- -6.94%
- YTD
- 0.05%
- 1Y
- 7.55%
- 3Y*
- -26.01%
- 5Y*
- -19.01%
- 10Y*
- 9.47%
ACT
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 5.52%
- 6M
- 11.56%
- YTD
- 14.10%
- 1Y
- 31.50%
- 3Y*
- 23.63%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SLP vs. ACT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLP Simulations Plus, Inc. | 0.05% | -34.64% | -37.40% | 23.09% | -22.28% | 8.56% |
ACT Enact Holdings, Inc. | 14.10% | 25.20% | 15.56% | 25.78% | 24.10% | 9.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLP and ACT is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2021 | 0.25 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SLP and ACT has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.25, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
SLP:
$368.75M
ACT:
$6.25B
SLP:
$0.40
ACT:
$4.65
SLP:
45.47
ACT:
9.62
SLP:
129.32
ACT:
1.14
SLP:
4.49
ACT:
5.25
SLP:
2.65
ACT:
1.19
SLP:
$82.06M
ACT:
$1.24B
SLP:
$52.01M
ACT:
$742.95M
SLP:
$13.91M
ACT:
$685.07M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLP vs. ACT — Risk / Return Rank
SLP
ACT
SLP vs. ACT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simulations Plus, Inc. (SLP) and Enact Holdings, Inc. (ACT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLP | ACT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.24 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.08 | 2.65 | -2.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.16 | 6.64 | -6.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLP vs. ACT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLP drawdown since its inception was -90.32%, which is greater than ACT's maximum drawdown of -20.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLP and ACT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLP | ACT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.32% | -20.25% | -70.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.49% | -10.96% | -34.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -77.81% | -15.33% | -62.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -82.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -87.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.23% | -2.10% | -77.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.26% | -5.11% | -41.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.90% | 4.36% | +19.54% |
Volatility
SLP vs. ACT - Volatility Comparison
Simulations Plus, Inc. (SLP) has a higher volatility of 11.43% compared to Enact Holdings, Inc. (ACT) at 4.85%. This indicates that SLP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLP | ACT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.43% | 4.85% | +6.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.87% | 17.27% | +20.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.63% | 22.07% | +34.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.40% | 24.64% | +26.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.42% | 24.64% | +23.78% |
Dividends
SLP vs. ACT - Dividend Comparison
SLP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ACT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACT Enact Holdings, Inc. | 1.94% | 2.06% | 2.92% | 4.60% | 6.38% | 5.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SLP Simulations Plus, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.65% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.51% | 0.33% | 0.83% | 1.21% | 1.30% | 2.07% | 2.02% |
Financials
SLP vs. ACT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Simulations Plus, Inc. and Enact Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SLP vs. ACT - Profitability Comparison
SLP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Simulations Plus, Inc. reported a gross profit of 15.13M and revenue of 21.89M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.1%.
ACT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Enact Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 312.07M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
SLP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Simulations Plus, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.50M and revenue of 21.89M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.6%.
ACT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Enact Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 312.07M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
SLP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Simulations Plus, Inc. reported a net income of 3.58M and revenue of 21.89M, resulting in a net margin of 16.3%.
ACT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Enact Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 167.77M and revenue of 312.07M, resulting in a net margin of 53.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SLP and ACT have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLP has higher volatility (11.43%) compared to ACT (4.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLP dropped -90.32% vs ACT's -20.25%.
ACT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLP and ACT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer