PECO vs. PINE
Compare and contrast key facts about Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) and Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PECO or PINE.
Key characteristics
| PECO | PINE | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -8.30% | -10.16% |
| 1Y Return | 12.44% | 1.00% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.58 | -0.03 |
| Daily Std Dev | 21.51% | 26.87% |
| Max Drawdown | -23.11% | -60.00% |
| Current Drawdown | -10.19% | -21.49% |
Fundamentals
| PECO | PINE | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $4.50B | $221.67M |
| EPS | $0.48 | -$0.05 |
| PE Ratio | 68.92 | 80.42 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $620.36M | $46.95M |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $412.15M | $39.77M |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $392.96M | $32.81M |
Correlation
The correlation between PECO and PINE is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
PECO vs. PINE - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, PECO achieves a -8.30% return, which is significantly higher than PINE's -10.16% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PECO vs. PINE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) and Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PECO vs. PINE - Dividend Comparison
PECO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, less than PINE's 7.37% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PECO Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. | 3.49% | 3.12% | 3.43% | 1.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PINE Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. | 7.37% | 6.51% | 5.71% | 5.06% | 5.47% | 0.30% |
Drawdowns
PECO vs. PINE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PECO drawdown since its inception was -23.11%, smaller than the maximum PINE drawdown of -60.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PECO and PINE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PECO vs. PINE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) is 7.11%, while Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE) has a volatility of 7.75%. This indicates that PECO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PINE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
PECO vs. PINE - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. and Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities