PortfoliosLab logo
PECO vs. PINE
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between PECO and PINE is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

PECO vs. PINE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) and Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PECO:

0.70

PINE:

0.08

Sortino Ratio

PECO:

1.12

PINE:

0.33

Omega Ratio

PECO:

1.13

PINE:

1.04

Calmar Ratio

PECO:

0.87

PINE:

0.13

Martin Ratio

PECO:

2.26

PINE:

0.34

Ulcer Index

PECO:

6.07%

PINE:

8.08%

Daily Std Dev

PECO:

19.30%

PINE:

22.88%

Max Drawdown

PECO:

-23.11%

PINE:

-60.00%

Current Drawdown

PECO:

-8.54%

PINE:

-17.25%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PECO:

$4.89B

PINE:

$228.80M

EPS

PECO:

$0.58

PINE:

$0.08

PE Ratio

PECO:

60.88

PINE:

184.63

PS Ratio

PECO:

7.20

PINE:

4.24

PB Ratio

PECO:

1.92

PINE:

0.87

Total Revenue (TTM)

PECO:

$678.99M

PINE:

$53.97M

Gross Profit (TTM)

PECO:

$421.87M

PINE:

$36.52M

EBITDA (TTM)

PECO:

$434.50M

PINE:

$39.56M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PECO achieves a -3.08% return, which is significantly higher than PINE's -8.75% return.


PECO

YTD

-3.08%

1M

1.50%

6M

-5.79%

1Y

12.83%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

PINE

YTD

-8.75%

1M

-6.75%

6M

-12.10%

1Y

1.73%

5Y*

12.11%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

PECO vs. PINE — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PECO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PECO is 7373
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PECO is 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PECO is 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PECO is 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PECO is 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PECO is 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

PINE
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PINE is 5252
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PINE is 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PINE is 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PINE is 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PINE is 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PINE is 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PECO vs. PINE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) and Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current PECO Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is higher than the PINE Sharpe Ratio of 0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PECO and PINE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

PECO vs. PINE - Dividend Comparison

PECO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, less than PINE's 7.44% yield.


TTM202420232022202120202019
PECO
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.
3.39%3.18%3.12%3.43%1.33%0.00%0.00%
PINE
Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc.
7.44%6.61%6.51%5.71%5.06%5.47%0.30%

Drawdowns

PECO vs. PINE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PECO drawdown since its inception was -23.11%, smaller than the maximum PINE drawdown of -60.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PECO and PINE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

PECO vs. PINE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) is 6.09%, while Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE) has a volatility of 6.85%. This indicates that PECO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PINE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

PECO vs. PINE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. and Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M20212022202320242025
178.31M
14.21M
(PECO) Total Revenue
(PINE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PECO vs. PINE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. and Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%20212022202320242025
71.4%
85.7%
(PECO) Gross Margin
(PINE) Gross Margin
PECO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. reported a gross profit of 127.30M and revenue of 178.31M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.4%.

PINE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. reported a gross profit of 12.17M and revenue of 14.21M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 85.7%.

PECO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. reported an operating income of 49.94M and revenue of 178.31M, resulting in an operating margin of 28.0%.

PINE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.27M and revenue of 14.21M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.0%.

PECO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. reported a net income of 26.31M and revenue of 178.31M, resulting in a net margin of 14.8%.

PINE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. reported a net income of -1.18M and revenue of 14.21M, resulting in a net margin of -8.3%.