PECO vs. HRZN

In the year-to-date period, PECO achieves a -5.27% return, which is significantly lower than HRZN's 2.16% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) and Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current PECO Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is higher than the HRZN Sharpe Ratio of -0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PECO and HRZN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

PECO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.45%, less than HRZN's 15.09% yield.

The maximum PECO drawdown since its inception was -23.11%, smaller than the maximum HRZN drawdown of -60.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PECO and HRZN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) is 8.89%, while Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) has a volatility of 13.16%. This indicates that PECO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HRZN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. and Horizon Technology Finance Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.