SHPP vs. QDPL

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF (SHPP) and Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL).

SHPP and QDPL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SHPP is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Pacer Global Supply Chain Infrastructure Index - Benchmark TR Net. It was launched on Jun 8, 2022. QDPL is an actively managed fund by Pacer. It was launched on Jul 12, 2021.

Performance

SHPP vs. QDPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF (SHPP) and Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SHPP vs. QDPL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
SHPP Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF	2.70%	12.88%	0.76%	20.86%	-4.12%
QDPL Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF	-4.29%	16.52%	22.83%	23.66%	-2.97%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHPP achieves a 2.70% return, which is significantly higher than QDPL's -4.29% return.

SHPP

• 1D: 2.99%
• 1M: -8.40%
• YTD: 2.70%
• 6M: 7.77%
• 1Y: 18.36%
• 3Y*: 8.22%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QDPL

• 1D: 2.81%
• 1M: -4.61%
• YTD: -4.29%
• 6M: -1.77%
• 1Y: 15.55%
• 3Y*: 16.66%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHPP vs. QDPL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHPP has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than QDPL's 0.60% expense ratio.

SHPP

Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF

QDPL

Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF

Return for Risk

SHPP vs. QDPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHPP

SHPP Risk / Return Rank: 55
SHPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
SHPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
SHPP Omega Ratio Rank: 52
SHPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
SHPP Martin Ratio Rank: 56

QDPL

QDPL Risk / Return Rank: 58
QDPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
QDPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
QDPL Omega Ratio Rank: 58
QDPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
QDPL Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHPP vs. QDPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF (SHPP) and Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SHPP	QDPL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.00	0.87	+0.13
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.50	1.34	+0.16
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.20	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.43	1.37	+0.06
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.64	6.60	-0.96
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SHPP vs. QDPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHPP Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is comparable to the QDPL Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHPP and QDPL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SHPP	QDPL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.00	0.87	+0.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.48	0.63	-0.15

Correlation

The correlation between SHPP and QDPL is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

SHPP vs. QDPL - Dividend Comparison

SHPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, less than QDPL's 5.13% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SHPP Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF	1.89%	1.80%	2.41%	2.89%	1.15%	0.00%
QDPL Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF	5.13%	4.84%	5.43%	6.30%	7.27%	2.44%

Drawdowns

SHPP vs. QDPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHPP drawdown since its inception was -21.57%, roughly equal to the maximum QDPL drawdown of -22.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHPP and QDPL.

Drawdown Indicators

	SHPP	QDPL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.57%	-22.59%	+1.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.89%	-11.94%	-0.95%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.40%	-6.08%	-2.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.38%	-5.30%	+0.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.27%	2.48%	+0.79%

Volatility

SHPP vs. QDPL - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF (SHPP) has a higher volatility of 6.32% compared to Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) at 5.30%. This indicates that SHPP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SHPP	QDPL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.32%	5.30%	+1.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.05%	9.39%	+1.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.42%	18.01%	+0.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.39%	15.12%	+2.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.39%	15.12%	+2.27%