QDPL vs. DGRW

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

QDPL (Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF) and DGRW (WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - QDPL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier Index - Series 400, while DGRW is a Quality Factor fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QDPL returned 11.81%/yr vs 11.41%/yr for DGRW. Their correlation of 0.89 means they have usually moved in the same direction. QDPL charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for DGRW.

Performance

QDPL vs. DGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDPL achieves a 9.38% return, which is significantly higher than DGRW's 8.57% return.

QDPL

• 1D: 0.60%
• 1M: -0.02%
• 6M: 8.07%
• YTD: 9.38%
• 1Y: 20.15%
• 3Y*: 17.85%
• 5Y*: 11.81%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.70%

DGRW

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: 0.69%
• 6M: 6.01%
• YTD: 8.57%
• 1Y: 16.02%
• 3Y*: 13.97%
• 5Y*: 11.41%
• 10Y*: 13.71%
• ALL TIME*: 12.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund	$51.03M	$48.50M	$56.54M
QDPL Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF	$5.21M	$5.24M	$6.26M

QDPL vs. DGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QDPL Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF	9.38%	16.52%	22.83%	23.66%	-16.25%	7.82%
DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund	8.57%	12.17%	16.98%	18.66%	-6.33%	9.66%

Correlation

The correlation between QDPL and DGRW is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2021	0.89

The correlation between QDPL and DGRW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

QDPL vs. DGRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QDPL	DGRW
Technology	31.0%	33.8%
Financial Services	10.0%	8.4%
Communication Services	7.6%	11.1%
Healthcare	7.5%	12.8%
Consumer Cyclical	7.2%	8.0%
Industrials	6.3%	11.8%
Consumer Defensive	3.8%	6.7%
Energy	2.8%	4.5%
Utilities	2.2%	0.2%
Real Estate	1.6%	-
Basic Materials	1.5%	2.8%

Return for Risk

QDPL vs. DGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QDPL

QDPL Risk / Return Rank: 63
QDPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
QDPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
QDPL Omega Ratio Rank: 61
QDPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
QDPL Martin Ratio Rank: 73

DGRW

DGRW Risk / Return Rank: 59
DGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
DGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
DGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 62
DGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
DGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QDPL vs. DGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QDPL	DGRW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.43	1.43	0.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.03	2.04	-0.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.26	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.10	1.79	+0.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.06	7.25	+1.82

QDPL vs. DGRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDPL Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the DGRW Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDPL and DGRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QDPL vs. DGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDPL drawdown since its inception was -22.59%, smaller than the maximum DGRW drawdown of -32.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDPL and DGRW.

Drawdown Indicators

	QDPL	DGRW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.59%	-32.04%	+9.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.65%	-8.30%	-0.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.75%	-16.21%	-1.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.59%	-17.27%	-5.32%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-32.04%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.57%	-1.31%	-0.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.04%	-3.00%	-2.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.00%	2.05%	-0.05%

Volatility

QDPL vs. DGRW - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) have volatilities of 3.02% and 2.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QDPL	DGRW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.02%	2.92%	+0.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.92%	8.33%	+1.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.68%	10.44%	+2.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.02%	14.01%	+1.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.99%	16.18%	-1.19%

QDPL vs. DGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDPL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.

Dividends

QDPL vs. DGRW - Dividend Comparison

QDPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, more than DGRW's 1.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund	1.28%	1.43%	1.55%	1.74%	2.15%	1.78%	1.93%	2.20%	2.42%	1.71%	2.13%	2.18%
QDPL Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF	4.58%	4.84%	5.43%	6.30%	7.27%	2.44%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QDPL and DGRW in my portfolio?

QDPL and DGRW have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QDPL or DGRW?

QDPL has higher volatility (3.02%) compared to DGRW (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDPL dropped -22.59% vs DGRW's -32.04%.

Which ETF is better, QDPL or DGRW?

On 5-year performance, QDPL leads with 11.81% vs 11.41% for DGRW. On fees, DGRW is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DGRW has been the lower-risk option at 2.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QDPL or DGRW?

Over the 5-year period, QDPL has performed better with a 11.81% return vs 11.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QDPL or DGRW?

DGRW is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QDPL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QDPL or DGRW?

QDPL has the higher dividend yield at 4.58%, compared with 1.28% for DGRW.

What is the main difference between QDPL and DGRW?

QDPL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DGRW is Quality Factor. QDPL tracks Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier Index - Series 400, while DGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QDPL and 0.28% for DGRW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QDPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.