QDPL vs. DGRW
QDPL (Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF) and DGRW (WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - QDPL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier Index - Series 400, while DGRW is a Dividend fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QDPL returned 19.54%/yr vs 15.46%/yr for DGRW. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QDPL charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for DGRW.
Performance
QDPL vs. DGRW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDPL achieves a 9.01% return, which is significantly higher than DGRW's 7.35% return.
QDPL
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- -0.26%
- YTD
- 9.01%
- 6M
- 8.69%
- 1Y
- 24.77%
- 3Y*
- 19.54%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DGRW
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- -0.70%
- YTD
- 7.35%
- 6M
- 7.02%
- 1Y
- 18.84%
- 3Y*
- 15.46%
- 5Y*
- 12.16%
- 10Y*
- 14.25%
QDPL vs. DGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDPL Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF | 9.01% | 16.52% | 22.83% | 23.66% | -16.25% | 7.82% |
DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 7.35% | 12.17% | 16.98% | 18.66% | -6.33% | 9.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDPL and DGRW is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2021 | 0.89 |
The correlation between QDPL and DGRW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
QDPL vs. DGRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QDPL
DGRW
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
QDPL
DGRW
Financial Services
QDPL
DGRW
Communication Services
QDPL
DGRW
Consumer Cyclical
QDPL
DGRW
Healthcare
QDPL
DGRW
Industrials
QDPL
DGRW
Consumer Defensive
QDPL
DGRW
Energy
QDPL
DGRW
Utilities
QDPL
DGRW
Real Estate
QDPL
DGRW
-
Basic Materials
QDPL
DGRW
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDPL vs. DGRW — Risk / Return Rank
QDPL
DGRW
QDPL vs. DGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QDPL | DGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.34 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.88 | 2.28 | +0.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.08 | 9.75 | +3.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QDPL vs. DGRW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDPL drawdown since its inception was -22.59%, smaller than the maximum DGRW drawdown of -32.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDPL and DGRW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDPL | DGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.59% | -32.04% | +9.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.65% | -8.30% | -0.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.75% | -16.21% | -1.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.27% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.90% | -2.42% | +0.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.11% | -3.01% | -2.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.90% | 1.94% | -0.04% |
Volatility
QDPL vs. DGRW - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) has a higher volatility of 4.86% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) at 3.64%. This indicates that QDPL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDPL | DGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.86% | 3.64% | +1.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.80% | 8.21% | +1.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.44% | 10.27% | +2.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.07% | 14.01% | +1.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.07% | 16.24% | -1.17% |
QDPL vs. DGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDPL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
QDPL vs. DGRW - Dividend Comparison
QDPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.11%, more than DGRW's 1.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 1.29% | 1.43% | 1.55% | 1.74% | 2.15% | 1.78% | 1.93% | 2.20% | 2.42% | 1.71% | 2.13% | 2.18% |
QDPL Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF | 5.11% | 4.84% | 5.43% | 6.30% | 7.27% | 2.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QDPL and DGRW have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QDPL has higher volatility (4.86%) compared to DGRW (3.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDPL dropped -22.59% vs DGRW's -32.04%.
On 3-year performance, QDPL leads with 19.54% vs 15.46% for DGRW. On fees, DGRW is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DGRW has been the lower-risk option at 3.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, QDPL has performed better with a 19.54% return vs 15.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DGRW is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QDPL.
QDPL has the higher dividend yield at 5.11%, compared with 1.29% for DGRW.
QDPL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DGRW is Dividend. QDPL tracks Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier Index - Series 400, while DGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QDPL and 0.28% for DGRW.
QDPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QDPL and DGRW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer