PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDPL vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDPL vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with QDPL having a 8.12% return and VOO slightly higher at 8.40%.


QDPL

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.42%
YTD
8.12%
6M
8.37%
1Y
23.09%
3Y*
19.61%
5Y*
10Y*

VOO

1D
-0.29%
1M
-0.05%
YTD
8.40%
6M
8.54%
1Y
24.41%
3Y*
21.33%
5Y*
13.32%
10Y*
15.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDPL vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QDPL
Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF
8.12%16.52%22.83%23.66%-16.25%7.82%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
8.40%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%9.40%

Correlation

The correlation between QDPL and VOO is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2021

0.95

The correlation between QDPL and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

QDPL vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QDPL
VOO

Technology

27.6%
35.7%

Financial Services

10.3%
11.6%

Communication Services

8.5%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%
10.2%

Healthcare

7.6%
8.5%

Industrials

6.3%
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
4.9%

Energy

2.4%
3.5%

Utilities

2.1%
2.4%

Real Estate

1.5%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.4%
1.8%

Technology

QDPL
27.6%
VOO
35.7%

Financial Services

QDPL
10.3%
VOO
11.6%

Communication Services

QDPL
8.5%
VOO
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

QDPL
8.4%
VOO
10.2%

Healthcare

QDPL
7.6%
VOO
8.5%

Industrials

QDPL
6.3%
VOO
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

QDPL
4.0%
VOO
4.9%

Energy

QDPL
2.4%
VOO
3.5%

Utilities

QDPL
2.1%
VOO
2.4%

Real Estate

QDPL
1.5%
VOO
1.9%

Basic Materials

QDPL
1.4%
VOO
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDPL vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDPL
QDPL Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
QDPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDPL Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
QDPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDPL Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDPL vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QDPLVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.37

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

2.76

-0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.42

12.66

-0.24

QDPL vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDPL Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDPL and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QDPLVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.90

2.03

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.87

-0.08

Drawdowns

QDPL vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDPL drawdown since its inception was -22.59%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDPL and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDPLVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.59%

-33.99%

+11.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.65%

-8.90%

+0.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.75%

-18.69%

+0.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.70%

-2.94%

+0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.13%

-3.69%

-1.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.86%

1.93%

-0.07%

Volatility

QDPL vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) has a higher volatility of 3.95% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 3.65%. This indicates that QDPL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDPLVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.95%

3.65%

+0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.51%

9.31%

+0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.20%

12.06%

+0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.05%

16.85%

-1.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.05%

18.03%

-2.98%

QDPL vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDPL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

QDPL vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

QDPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.15%, more than VOO's 1.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QDPL
Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF
5.15%4.84%5.43%6.30%7.27%2.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.05%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, QDPL and VOO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

QDPL has higher volatility (3.95%) compared to VOO (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDPL dropped -22.59% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 3-year performance, VOO leads with 21.33% vs 19.61% for QDPL. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 3.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, VOO has performed better with a 21.33% return vs 19.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QDPL.

QDPL has the higher dividend yield at 5.15%, compared with 1.05% for VOO.

QDPL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QDPL and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDPL and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer