PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDPL vs. BALI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDPL vs. BALI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) and Blackrock Advantage Large Cap Income ETF (BALI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDPL achieves a 9.38% return, which is significantly lower than BALI's 12.53% return.


QDPL

1D
0.60%
1M
-0.02%
6M
8.07%
YTD
9.38%
1Y
20.15%
3Y*
17.85%
5Y*
11.81%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.70%

BALI

1D
0.56%
1M
1.43%
6M
10.03%
YTD
12.53%
1Y
23.42%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
21.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$7.45M$7.43M$9.08M
$5.21M$5.24M$6.26M

QDPL vs. BALI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
QDPL
Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF
9.38%16.52%22.83%10.99%
BALI
Blackrock Advantage Large Cap Income ETF
12.53%14.51%22.38%9.71%

Correlation

The correlation between QDPL and BALI is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2023

0.91

The correlation between QDPL and BALI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

QDPL vs. BALI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QDPL
BALI

Technology

31.0%
36.2%

Financial Services

10.0%
9.7%

Communication Services

7.6%
10.0%

Healthcare

7.5%
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

7.2%
10.1%

Industrials

6.3%
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

3.8%
6.0%

Energy

2.8%
4.1%

Utilities

2.2%
1.6%

Real Estate

1.6%
2.2%

Basic Materials

1.5%
1.4%

Technology

QDPL
31.0%
BALI
36.2%

Financial Services

QDPL
10.0%
BALI
9.7%

Communication Services

QDPL
7.6%
BALI
10.0%

Healthcare

QDPL
7.5%
BALI
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

QDPL
7.2%
BALI
10.1%

Industrials

QDPL
6.3%
BALI
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

QDPL
3.8%
BALI
6.0%

Energy

QDPL
2.8%
BALI
4.1%

Utilities

QDPL
2.2%
BALI
1.6%

Real Estate

QDPL
1.6%
BALI
2.2%

Basic Materials

QDPL
1.5%
BALI
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDPL vs. BALI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QDPL
QDPL Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
QDPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDPL Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
QDPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDPL Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

BALI
BALI Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
BALI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BALI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
BALI Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
BALI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
BALI Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QDPL vs. BALI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) and Blackrock Advantage Large Cap Income ETF (BALI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QDPLBALIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.37

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

3.23

-1.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.06

15.05

-5.99

QDPL vs. BALI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDPL Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the BALI Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDPL and BALI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QDPL vs. BALI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDPL drawdown since its inception was -22.59%, which is greater than BALI's maximum drawdown of -16.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDPL and BALI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDPLBALIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.59%

-16.65%

-5.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.65%

-6.71%

-1.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.57%

0.00%

-1.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.04%

-1.60%

-3.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

1.44%

+0.56%

Volatility

QDPL vs. BALI - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) and Blackrock Advantage Large Cap Income ETF (BALI) have volatilities of 3.02% and 2.93%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDPLBALIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.02%

2.93%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.92%

8.42%

+1.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.68%

10.73%

+1.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.02%

12.90%

+2.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.99%

12.90%

+2.09%

QDPL vs. BALI - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDPL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than BALI's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

QDPL vs. BALI - Dividend Comparison

QDPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, less than BALI's 7.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
BALI
Blackrock Advantage Large Cap Income ETF
7.23%8.51%7.13%2.13%0.00%0.00%
QDPL
Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF
4.58%4.84%5.43%6.30%7.27%2.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, QDPL and BALI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

QDPL has higher volatility (3.02%) compared to BALI (2.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDPL dropped -22.59% vs BALI's -16.65%.

On 1-year performance, BALI leads with 23.42% vs 20.15% for QDPL. On fees, BALI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BALI has performed better with a 23.42% return vs 20.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BALI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QDPL.

BALI has the higher dividend yield at 7.23%, compared with 4.58% for QDPL.

QDPL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BALI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QDPL and 0.35% for BALI.

BALI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDPL and BALI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer