SHPP vs. QPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF (SHPP) and AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX).
SHPP and QPX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SHPP is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Pacer Global Supply Chain Infrastructure Index - Benchmark TR Net. It was launched on Jun 8, 2022. QPX is an actively managed fund by AdvisorShares. It was launched on Dec 28, 2020.
Performance
SHPP vs. QPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SHPP vs. QPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHPP Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF | 2.70% | 12.88% | 0.76% | 20.86% | -4.12% |
QPX AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF | -3.86% | 24.12% | 17.28% | 44.63% | -9.96% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHPP achieves a 2.70% return, which is significantly higher than QPX's -3.86% return.
SHPP
- 1D
- 2.99%
- 1M
- -8.40%
- YTD
- 2.70%
- 6M
- 7.77%
- 1Y
- 18.36%
- 3Y*
- 8.22%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QPX
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- -6.13%
- YTD
- -3.86%
- 6M
- -0.84%
- 1Y
- 23.97%
- 3Y*
- 19.36%
- 5Y*
- 10.41%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SHPP vs. QPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SHPP has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than QPX's 1.46% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SHPP vs. QPX — Risk / Return Rank
SHPP
QPX
SHPP vs. QPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF (SHPP) and AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SHPP | QPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.00 | 1.25 | -0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.50 | 1.88 | -0.38 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.28 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.43 | 2.05 | -0.62 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.64 | 8.04 | -2.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SHPP | QPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 | 1.25 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.54 | -0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between SHPP and QPX is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SHPP vs. QPX - Dividend Comparison
SHPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, while QPX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHPP Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF | 1.89% | 1.80% | 2.41% | 2.89% | 1.15% |
QPX AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SHPP vs. QPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHPP drawdown since its inception was -21.57%, smaller than the maximum QPX drawdown of -34.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHPP and QPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHPP | QPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.57% | -34.74% | +13.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.89% | -12.02% | -0.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.40% | -8.21% | -0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.38% | -8.27% | +3.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.27% | 3.06% | +0.21% |
Volatility
SHPP vs. QPX - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF (SHPP) has a higher volatility of 6.32% compared to AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX) at 5.19%. This indicates that SHPP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SHPP | QPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.32% | 5.19% | +1.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.05% | 11.47% | -0.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.42% | 19.26% | -0.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.39% | 19.99% | -2.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.39% | 20.15% | -2.76% |