PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHPP vs. QPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SHPP vs. QPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF (SHPP) and AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SHPP vs. QPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SHPP
Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF
2.70%12.88%0.76%20.86%-4.12%
QPX
AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF
-3.86%24.12%17.28%44.63%-9.96%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHPP achieves a 2.70% return, which is significantly higher than QPX's -3.86% return.


SHPP

1D
2.99%
1M
-8.40%
YTD
2.70%
6M
7.77%
1Y
18.36%
3Y*
8.22%
5Y*
10Y*

QPX

1D
1.08%
1M
-6.13%
YTD
-3.86%
6M
-0.84%
1Y
23.97%
3Y*
19.36%
5Y*
10.41%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SHPP vs. QPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHPP has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than QPX's 1.46% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SHPP vs. QPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHPP
SHPP Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
SHPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHPP Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
SHPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHPP Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

QPX
QPX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
QPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
QPX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
QPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
QPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHPP vs. QPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF (SHPP) and AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SHPPQPXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.00

1.25

-0.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.50

1.88

-0.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.28

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

2.05

-0.62

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.64

8.04

-2.39

SHPP vs. QPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHPP Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is comparable to the QPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHPP and QPX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SHPPQPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

1.25

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.54

-0.06

Correlation

The correlation between SHPP and QPX is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

SHPP vs. QPX - Dividend Comparison

SHPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, while QPX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022
SHPP
Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF
1.89%1.80%2.41%2.89%1.15%
QPX
AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

SHPP vs. QPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHPP drawdown since its inception was -21.57%, smaller than the maximum QPX drawdown of -34.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHPP and QPX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SHPPQPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.57%

-34.74%

+13.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.89%

-12.02%

-0.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.40%

-8.21%

-0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.38%

-8.27%

+3.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.27%

3.06%

+0.21%

Volatility

SHPP vs. QPX - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF (SHPP) has a higher volatility of 6.32% compared to AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX) at 5.19%. This indicates that SHPP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SHPPQPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.32%

5.19%

+1.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.05%

11.47%

-0.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.42%

19.26%

-0.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.39%

19.99%

-2.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.39%

20.15%

-2.76%