SHPP vs. GABF
SHPP (Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF) and GABF (Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SHPP is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Pacer Global Supply Chain Infrastructure Index - Benchmark TR Net, while GABF is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by Gabelli. SHPP is passively managed, while GABF is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, SHPP returned 10.45%/yr vs 18.82%/yr for GABF. Their 0.68 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SHPP charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for GABF.
Performance
SHPP vs. GABF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHPP achieves a 18.08% return, which is significantly higher than GABF's -1.93% return.
SHPP
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 1.57%
- 6M
- 14.15%
- YTD
- 18.08%
- 1Y
- 27.78%
- 3Y*
- 10.45%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.27%
GABF
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -0.11%
- 6M
- -1.06%
- YTD
- -1.93%
- 1Y
- -1.61%
- 3Y*
- 18.82%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 18.34%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $95.56K | $89.02K | $204.10K | |
| $5.70K | $6.05K | $3.27K |
SHPP vs. GABF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHPP Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF | 18.08% | 12.88% | 0.76% | 20.86% | -4.12% |
GABF Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF | -1.93% | 3.60% | 44.38% | 38.92% | -4.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between SHPP and GABF is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2022 | 0.68 |
The correlation between SHPP and GABF shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SHPP vs. GABF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SHPP
GABF
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
-
Industrials
SHPP
GABF
Technology
SHPP
GABF
Consumer Cyclical
SHPP
GABF
-
Consumer Defensive
SHPP
GABF
-
Financial Services
SHPP
GABF
Communication Services
SHPP
GABF
-
Basic Materials
SHPP
-
GABF
-
Energy
SHPP
-
GABF
-
Healthcare
SHPP
-
GABF
-
Real Estate
SHPP
-
GABF
Utilities
SHPP
-
GABF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SHPP vs. GABF — Risk / Return Rank
SHPP
GABF
SHPP vs. GABF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF (SHPP) and Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SHPP | GABF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 0.97 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.40 | -0.26 | +2.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.36 | -0.56 | +9.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SHPP vs. GABF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHPP drawdown since its inception was -21.57%, roughly equal to the maximum GABF drawdown of -20.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHPP and GABF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHPP | GABF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.57% | -20.86% | -0.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.06% | -17.16% | +6.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.84% | -20.86% | +2.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.96% | -6.75% | +5.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.16% | -4.97% | +0.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.82% | 7.90% | -5.08% |
Volatility
SHPP vs. GABF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF (SHPP) is 2.87%, while Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF) has a volatility of 4.51%. This indicates that SHPP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GABF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SHPP | GABF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.87% | 4.51% | -1.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.54% | 13.17% | -0.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.30% | 17.57% | -2.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.33% | 20.37% | -3.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.33% | 20.37% | -3.04% |
SHPP vs. GABF - Expense Ratio Comparison
SHPP has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than GABF's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
SHPP vs. GABF - Dividend Comparison
SHPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, less than GABF's 2.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GABF Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF | 2.00% | 1.96% | 4.19% | 4.95% | 1.31% |
SHPP Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF | 1.69% | 1.80% | 2.41% | 2.89% | 1.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SHPP and GABF have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GABF has higher volatility (4.51%) compared to SHPP (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHPP dropped -21.57% vs GABF's -20.86%.
On 3-year performance, GABF leads with 18.82% vs 10.45% for SHPP. On fees, GABF is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, SHPP has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, GABF has performed better with a 18.82% return vs 10.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GABF is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for SHPP.
GABF has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 1.69% for SHPP.
SHPP is categorized as Industrials Equities, while GABF is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Gabelli. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for SHPP and 0.10% for GABF.
SHPP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SHPP and GABF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer