SHPP vs. SEA
Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF (SHPP) and U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF (SEA).
SHPP and SEA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SHPP is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Pacer Global Supply Chain Infrastructure Index - Benchmark TR Net. It was launched on Jun 8, 2022. SEA is a passively managed fund by US Global that tracks the performance of the U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Jan 19, 2022. Both SHPP and SEA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SHPP or SEA.
Correlation
The correlation between SHPP and SEA is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
SHPP vs. SEA - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
SHPP:
-0.10
SEA:
-0.49
SHPP:
0.09
SEA:
-0.35
SHPP:
1.01
SEA:
0.95
SHPP:
-0.02
SEA:
-0.24
SHPP:
-0.09
SEA:
-0.54
SHPP:
4.93%
SEA:
14.65%
SHPP:
18.10%
SEA:
22.38%
SHPP:
-21.57%
SEA:
-39.52%
SHPP:
-7.63%
SEA:
-18.67%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SHPP having a -1.77% return and SEA slightly lower at -1.85%.
SHPP
-1.77%
7.62%
-7.03%
-2.16%
N/A
N/A
SEA
-1.85%
14.06%
-6.32%
-11.65%
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SHPP vs. SEA - Expense Ratio Comparison
SHPP has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than SEA's 0.60% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SHPP vs. SEA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
SHPP
SEA
SHPP vs. SEA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF (SHPP) and U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF (SEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
SHPP vs. SEA - Dividend Comparison
SHPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, less than SEA's 18.82% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SHPP Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF | 2.71% | 2.41% | 2.89% | 1.14% |
SEA U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF | 18.82% | 18.47% | 9.85% | 18.72% |
Drawdowns
SHPP vs. SEA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHPP drawdown since its inception was -21.57%, smaller than the maximum SEA drawdown of -39.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHPP and SEA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
SHPP vs. SEA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF (SHPP) is 5.23%, while U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF (SEA) has a volatility of 7.30%. This indicates that SHPP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...