QDPL vs. DGRO
Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO).
QDPL and DGRO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QDPL is an actively managed fund by Pacer. It was launched on Jul 12, 2021. DGRO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. It was launched on Jun 10, 2014.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: QDPL or DGRO.
Key characteristics
| QDPL | DGRO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 17.29% | 16.47% |
| 1Y Return | 25.49% | 23.34% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 9.06% | 8.98% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.24 | 2.27 |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.42% | 10.16% |
| Max Drawdown | -22.59% | -35.10% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.76% | -0.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDPL and DGRO is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
QDPL vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with QDPL having a 17.29% return and DGRO slightly lower at 16.47%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QDPL vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDPL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
QDPL vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
QDPL vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison
QDPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.51%, more than DGRO's 2.20% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDPL Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF | 5.51% | 6.30% | 7.27% | 2.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 2.20% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.52% | 0.97% |
Drawdowns
QDPL vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDPL drawdown since its inception was -22.59%, smaller than the maximum DGRO drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDPL and DGRO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
QDPL vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) has a higher volatility of 3.45% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.67%. This indicates that QDPL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.