SHPP vs. GCOW

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SHPP (Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF) and GCOW (Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SHPP is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Pacer Global Supply Chain Infrastructure Index - Benchmark TR Net, while GCOW is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SHPP returned 13.21%/yr vs 17.41%/yr for GCOW. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SHPP charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for GCOW.

Performance

SHPP vs. GCOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF (SHPP) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHPP achieves a 17.15% return, which is significantly higher than GCOW's 12.18% return.

SHPP

• 1D: -1.13%
• 1M: 6.92%
• YTD: 17.15%
• 6M: 18.13%
• 1Y: 26.19%
• 3Y*: 13.21%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GCOW

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: 0.09%
• YTD: 12.18%
• 6M: 13.23%
• 1Y: 27.12%
• 3Y*: 17.41%
• 5Y*: 12.34%
• 10Y*: 9.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHPP vs. GCOW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
SHPP Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF	17.15%	12.88%	0.76%	20.86%	-4.12%
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF	12.18%	27.34%	3.52%	13.95%	-2.71%

Correlation

The correlation between SHPP and GCOW is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2022	0.69

The correlation between SHPP and GCOW shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.69 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SHPP vs. GCOW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SHPP	GCOW
Industrials	80.9%	12.4%
Technology	14.2%	0.9%
Consumer Cyclical	2.2%	4.6%
Basic Materials	-	7.3%
Communication Services	-	14.6%
Consumer Defensive	-	17.1%
Energy	-	24.4%
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	14.6%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	4.1%

Return for Risk

SHPP vs. GCOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHPP

SHPP Risk / Return Rank: 50
SHPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
SHPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
SHPP Omega Ratio Rank: 48
SHPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
SHPP Martin Ratio Rank: 53

GCOW

GCOW Risk / Return Rank: 79
GCOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
GCOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
GCOW Omega Ratio Rank: 72
GCOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
GCOW Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHPP vs. GCOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF (SHPP) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SHPP	GCOW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.74	2.52	-0.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.44	3.63	-1.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.44	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.38	5.71	-3.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.01	15.05	-6.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SHPP vs. GCOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHPP Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is lower than the GCOW Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHPP and GCOW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SHPP	GCOW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.74	2.52	-0.78
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.92	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.61	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.66	0.59	+0.08

Drawdowns

SHPP vs. GCOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHPP drawdown since its inception was -21.57%, smaller than the maximum GCOW drawdown of -37.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHPP and GCOW.

Drawdown Indicators

	SHPP	GCOW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.57%	-37.64%	+16.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.06%	-4.77%	-6.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.84%	-12.35%	-6.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.48%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-37.64%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.13%	-2.73%	+1.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.26%	-5.84%	+1.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.91%	1.81%	+1.10%

Volatility

SHPP vs. GCOW - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF (SHPP) has a higher volatility of 4.65% compared to Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) at 2.85%. This indicates that SHPP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GCOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SHPP	GCOW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.65%	2.85%	+1.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.10%	7.99%	+4.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.09%	10.81%	+4.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.45%	13.49%	+3.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.45%	16.20%	+1.25%

SHPP vs. GCOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHPP has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than GCOW's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

SHPP vs. GCOW - Dividend Comparison

SHPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, less than GCOW's 4.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF	4.43%	4.06%	5.14%	5.28%	4.39%	4.23%	4.12%	4.40%	3.94%	2.79%	1.95%
SHPP Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF	1.65%	1.80%	2.41%	2.89%	1.15%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SHPP and GCOW in my portfolio?

SHPP and GCOW have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SHPP or GCOW?

SHPP has higher volatility (4.65%) compared to GCOW (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHPP dropped -21.57% vs GCOW's -37.64%.

Which ETF is better, SHPP or GCOW?

On 3-year performance, GCOW leads with 17.41% vs 13.21% for SHPP. On fees, GCOW is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, GCOW has been the lower-risk option at 2.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SHPP or GCOW?

Over the 3-year period, GCOW has performed better with a 17.41% return vs 13.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SHPP or GCOW?

GCOW is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for SHPP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SHPP or GCOW?

GCOW has the higher dividend yield at 4.43%, compared with 1.65% for SHPP.

What is the main difference between SHPP and GCOW?

SHPP is categorized as Industrials Equities, while GCOW is Large Cap Value Equities. SHPP tracks Pacer Global Supply Chain Infrastructure Index - Benchmark TR Net, while GCOW tracks Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for SHPP and 0.60% for GCOW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GCOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.