PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEI vs. CLS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SEI vs. CLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc (SEI) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SEI having a 12.30% return and CLS slightly lower at 12.12%.


SEI

1D
0.25%
1M
-29.98%
6M
-6.46%
YTD
12.30%
1Y
58.96%
3Y*
73.99%
5Y*
47.96%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
20.73%

CLS

1D
-6.00%
1M
-8.35%
6M
17.95%
YTD
12.12%
1Y
65.84%
3Y*
149.34%
5Y*
106.30%
10Y*
40.47%
ALL TIME*
13.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.16B$852.74M$822.47M
$200.05M$228.81M$190.63M

SEI vs. CLS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SEI
Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc
12.30%62.29%277.66%-15.75%57.46%-15.55%-38.09%19.10%-43.06%75.35%
CLS
Celestica Inc.
12.12%220.27%215.23%159.80%1.26%37.92%-2.42%-5.70%-16.32%-25.94%

Correlation

The correlation between SEI and CLS is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2017

0.31

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SEI:

$3.15B

CLS:

$38.11B

EPS

SEI:

$0.97

CLS:

$9.64

PE Ratio

SEI:

52.86

CLS:

34.38

PS Ratio

SEI:

3.54

CLS:

2.46

PB Ratio

SEI:

3.26

CLS:

15.53

Total Revenue (TTM)

SEI:

$692.11M

CLS:

$15.62B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SEI:

$235.28M

CLS:

$1.81B

EBITDA (TTM)

SEI:

$249.65M

CLS:

$1.50B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEI vs. CLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SEI
SEI Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
SEI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEI Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
SEI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEI Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

CLS
CLS Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
CLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLS Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
CLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLS Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SEI vs. CLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc (SEI) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SEICLSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.19

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.24

1.83

-0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.72

4.27

+0.45

SEI vs. CLS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEI Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is comparable to the CLS Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEI and CLS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SEI vs. CLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEI drawdown since its inception was -79.49%, smaller than the maximum CLS drawdown of -96.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEI and CLS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEICLSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.49%

-96.93%

+17.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.61%

-36.21%

-11.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.37%

-53.96%

-1.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.37%

-53.96%

-1.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.97%

-29.84%

-8.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.32%

-73.10%

+34.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.78%

15.47%

-2.69%

Volatility

SEI vs. CLS - Volatility Comparison

Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc (SEI) has a higher volatility of 30.50% compared to Celestica Inc. (CLS) at 25.97%. This indicates that SEI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEICLSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

30.50%

25.97%

+4.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

57.43%

55.62%

+1.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

77.63%

74.89%

+2.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

68.06%

58.52%

+9.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.88%

50.65%

+12.23%

Dividends

SEI vs. CLS - Dividend Comparison

SEI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, while CLS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CLS
Celestica Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SEI
Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc
0.93%1.04%1.67%5.65%4.23%6.41%5.16%2.89%0.83%

Financials

SEI vs. CLS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc and Celestica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

SEI vs. CLS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc and Celestica Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

SEI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc reported a gross profit of 72.72M and revenue of 196.24M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.1%.

CLS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a gross profit of 577.50M and revenue of 4.70B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.3%.

SEI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc reported an operating income of 50.56M and revenue of 196.24M, resulting in an operating margin of 25.8%.

CLS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Celestica Inc. reported an operating income of 458.30M and revenue of 4.70B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.8%.

SEI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc reported a net income of 21.44M and revenue of 196.24M, resulting in a net margin of 10.9%.

CLS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a net income of 368.80M and revenue of 4.70B, resulting in a net margin of 7.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SEI and CLS have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SEI has higher volatility (30.50%) compared to CLS (25.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEI dropped -79.49% vs CLS's -96.93%.

CLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEI and CLS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer