SEI vs. PWR
SEI (Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc) and PWR (Quanta Services, Inc.) are both stocks. SEI operates in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (Energy), while PWR operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, SEI returned 51.23%/yr vs 50.10%/yr for PWR. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SEI vs. PWR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEI achieves a 57.10% return, which is significantly lower than PWR's 67.37% return.
SEI
- 1D
- 4.87%
- 1M
- -0.39%
- YTD
- 57.10%
- 6M
- 43.44%
- 1Y
- 163.70%
- 3Y*
- 113.77%
- 5Y*
- 51.23%
- 10Y*
- —
PWR
- 1D
- 2.70%
- 1M
- -4.87%
- YTD
- 67.37%
- 6M
- 55.34%
- 1Y
- 104.54%
- 3Y*
- 57.89%
- 5Y*
- 50.10%
- 10Y*
- 40.74%
SEI vs. PWR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEI Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc | 57.10% | 62.29% | 277.66% | -15.75% | 57.46% | -15.55% | -38.09% | 19.10% | -43.06% | 85.37% |
PWR Quanta Services, Inc. | 67.37% | 33.70% | 46.60% | 51.70% | 24.63% | 59.50% | 77.74% | 35.84% | -22.93% | 20.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between SEI and PWR is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2017 | 0.35 |
Fundamentals
SEI:
$3.56B
PWR:
$107.38B
SEI:
$1.03
PWR:
$7.29
SEI:
70.15
PWR:
96.85
SEI:
4.69
PWR:
3.57
SEI:
4.56
PWR:
11.87
SEI:
$692.11M
PWR:
$29.99B
SEI:
$235.28M
PWR:
$4.08B
SEI:
$249.65M
PWR:
$2.40B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEI vs. PWR — Risk / Return Rank
SEI
PWR
SEI vs. PWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc (SEI) and Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SEI | PWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.24 | 2.90 | -0.67 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.67 | 3.60 | -0.93 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.48 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.28 | 8.54 | -2.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.79 | 21.30 | -5.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SEI | PWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.24 | 2.90 | -0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 1.42 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.21 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.35 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
SEI vs. PWR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEI drawdown since its inception was -79.49%, smaller than the maximum PWR drawdown of -97.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEI and PWR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEI | PWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.49% | -97.07% | +17.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.43% | -12.45% | -13.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.37% | -33.89% | -21.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.37% | -33.89% | -21.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.32% | -10.08% | +1.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.71% | -46.88% | +8.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.51% | 4.99% | +5.52% |
Volatility
SEI vs. PWR - Volatility Comparison
Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc (SEI) has a higher volatility of 15.19% compared to Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) at 12.01%. This indicates that SEI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PWR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SEI | PWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.19% | 12.01% | +3.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.04% | 29.55% | +21.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 73.63% | 36.22% | +37.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 66.41% | 35.60% | +30.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.12% | 33.69% | +28.43% |
Dividends
SEI vs. PWR - Dividend Comparison
SEI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, more than PWR's 0.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PWR Quanta Services, Inc. | 0.06% | 0.09% | 0.09% | 0.15% | 0.25% | 0.16% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.13% |
SEI Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc | 0.83% | 1.04% | 1.67% | 5.65% | 4.23% | 6.41% | 5.16% | 2.89% | 0.83% |
Financials
SEI vs. PWR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc and Quanta Services, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SEI vs. PWR - Profitability Comparison
SEI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc reported a gross profit of 72.72M and revenue of 196.24M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.1%.
PWR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.11B and revenue of 7.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.1%.
SEI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc reported an operating income of 50.56M and revenue of 196.24M, resulting in an operating margin of 25.8%.
PWR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 338.78M and revenue of 7.87B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.3%.
SEI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc reported a net income of 21.44M and revenue of 196.24M, resulting in a net margin of 10.9%.
PWR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported a net income of 220.63M and revenue of 7.87B, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SEI and PWR have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SEI has higher volatility (15.19%) compared to PWR (12.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEI dropped -79.49% vs PWR's -97.07%.
PWR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SEI and PWR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer