PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEI vs. PWR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SEI vs. PWR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc (SEI) and Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEI achieves a 57.10% return, which is significantly lower than PWR's 67.37% return.


SEI

1D
4.87%
1M
-0.39%
YTD
57.10%
6M
43.44%
1Y
163.70%
3Y*
113.77%
5Y*
51.23%
10Y*

PWR

1D
2.70%
1M
-4.87%
YTD
67.37%
6M
55.34%
1Y
104.54%
3Y*
57.89%
5Y*
50.10%
10Y*
40.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEI vs. PWR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SEI
Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc
57.10%62.29%277.66%-15.75%57.46%-15.55%-38.09%19.10%-43.06%85.37%
PWR
Quanta Services, Inc.
67.37%33.70%46.60%51.70%24.63%59.50%77.74%35.84%-22.93%20.38%

Correlation

The correlation between SEI and PWR is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2017

0.35

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SEI:

$3.56B

PWR:

$107.38B

EPS

SEI:

$1.03

PWR:

$7.29

PE Ratio

SEI:

70.15

PWR:

96.85

PS Ratio

SEI:

4.69

PWR:

3.57

PB Ratio

SEI:

4.56

PWR:

11.87

Total Revenue (TTM)

SEI:

$692.11M

PWR:

$29.99B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SEI:

$235.28M

PWR:

$4.08B

EBITDA (TTM)

SEI:

$249.65M

PWR:

$2.40B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEI vs. PWR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEI
SEI Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
SEI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEI Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
SEI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEI Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

PWR
PWR Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
PWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
PWR Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
PWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
PWR Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEI vs. PWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc (SEI) and Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SEIPWRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.24

2.90

-0.67

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.67

3.60

-0.93

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.48

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.28

8.54

-2.26

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.79

21.30

-5.50

SEI vs. PWR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEI Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the PWR Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEI and PWR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SEIPWRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

2.90

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

1.42

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.35

+0.07

Drawdowns

SEI vs. PWR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEI drawdown since its inception was -79.49%, smaller than the maximum PWR drawdown of -97.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEI and PWR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEIPWRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.49%

-97.07%

+17.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.43%

-12.45%

-13.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.37%

-33.89%

-21.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.37%

-33.89%

-21.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.32%

-10.08%

+1.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.71%

-46.88%

+8.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.51%

4.99%

+5.52%

Volatility

SEI vs. PWR - Volatility Comparison

Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc (SEI) has a higher volatility of 15.19% compared to Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) at 12.01%. This indicates that SEI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PWR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEIPWRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.19%

12.01%

+3.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

51.04%

29.55%

+21.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

73.63%

36.22%

+37.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

66.41%

35.60%

+30.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.12%

33.69%

+28.43%

Dividends

SEI vs. PWR - Dividend Comparison

SEI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, more than PWR's 0.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
PWR
Quanta Services, Inc.
0.06%0.09%0.09%0.15%0.25%0.16%0.29%0.42%0.13%
SEI
Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc
0.83%1.04%1.67%5.65%4.23%6.41%5.16%2.89%0.83%

Financials

SEI vs. PWR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc and Quanta Services, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B20222023202420252026
196.24M
7.87B
(SEI) Total Revenue
(PWR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SEI vs. PWR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc and Quanta Services, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%20222023202420252026
37.1%
14.1%
Portfolio components
SEI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc reported a gross profit of 72.72M and revenue of 196.24M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.1%.

PWR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.11B and revenue of 7.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.1%.

SEI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc reported an operating income of 50.56M and revenue of 196.24M, resulting in an operating margin of 25.8%.

PWR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 338.78M and revenue of 7.87B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.3%.

SEI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc reported a net income of 21.44M and revenue of 196.24M, resulting in a net margin of 10.9%.

PWR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported a net income of 220.63M and revenue of 7.87B, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SEI and PWR have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SEI has higher volatility (15.19%) compared to PWR (12.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEI dropped -79.49% vs PWR's -97.07%.

PWR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEI and PWR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer