SEI vs. EQT

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

SEI (Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc) and EQT (EQT Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Energy sector — SEI in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services, EQT in Oil & Gas E&P. Over the past 5 years, SEI returned 55.84%/yr vs 20.13%/yr for EQT. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

SEI vs. EQT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc (SEI) and EQT Corporation (EQT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEI achieves a 65.97% return, which is significantly higher than EQT's -3.41% return.

SEI

• 1D: -2.53%
• 1M: 2.48%
• YTD: 65.97%
• 6M: 69.29%
• 1Y: 170.82%
• 3Y*: 119.19%
• 5Y*: 55.84%
• 10Y*: —

EQT

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: -11.12%
• YTD: -3.41%
• 6M: -3.93%
• 1Y: -13.68%
• 3Y*: 11.09%
• 5Y*: 20.13%
• 10Y*: 3.03%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEI vs. EQT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SEI Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc	65.97%	62.29%	277.66%	-15.75%	57.46%	-15.55%	-38.09%	19.10%	-43.06%	75.35%
EQT EQT Corporation	-3.41%	17.64%	21.41%	16.20%	57.64%	71.60%	17.27%	-41.82%	-38.82%	0.41%

Correlation

The correlation between SEI and EQT is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.04
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.26
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2017	0.36

Over the past year, the correlation between SEI and EQT has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.36, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap SEI : $3.76B EQT : $32.18B
EPS SEI : $1.03 EQT : $5.40
PE Ratio SEI : 74.11 EQT : 9.53
PS Ratio SEI : 4.96 EQT : 3.18
PB Ratio SEI : 4.82 EQT : 1.28
Total Revenue (TTM) SEI : $692.11M EQT : $10.03B
Gross Profit (TTM) SEI : $235.28M EQT : $6.43B
EBITDA (TTM) SEI : $249.65M EQT : $7.48B

Return for Risk

SEI vs. EQT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEI

SEI Risk / Return Rank: 91
SEI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
SEI Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
SEI Omega Ratio Rank: 85
SEI Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
SEI Martin Ratio Rank: 94

EQT

EQT Risk / Return Rank: 22
EQT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
EQT Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
EQT Omega Ratio Rank: 24
EQT Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
EQT Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEI vs. EQT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc (SEI) and EQT Corporation (EQT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SEI	EQT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.34	-0.43	+2.77
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.76	-0.40	+3.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	0.95	+0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.50	-0.55	+7.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.36	-1.19	+17.55

SEI vs. EQT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEI Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is higher than the EQT Sharpe Ratio of -0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEI and EQT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SEI vs. EQT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEI drawdown since its inception was -79.49%, smaller than the maximum EQT drawdown of -91.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEI and EQT.

Drawdown Indicators

	SEI	EQT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.49%	-91.51%	+12.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.43%	-25.12%	-1.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-55.37%	-31.62%	-23.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-55.37%	-42.56%	-12.81%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-88.28%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.33%	-24.00%	+15.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-38.50%	-23.34%	-15.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.49%	12.11%	-1.62%

Volatility

SEI vs. EQT - Volatility Comparison

Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc (SEI) has a higher volatility of 22.03% compared to EQT Corporation (EQT) at 6.65%. This indicates that SEI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SEI	EQT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.03%	6.65%	+15.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	50.26%	20.88%	+29.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	73.49%	32.32%	+41.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	66.75%	42.59%	+24.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	62.28%	48.92%	+13.36%

Dividends

SEI vs. EQT - Dividend Comparison

SEI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than EQT's 1.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EQT EQT Corporation	1.27%	1.19%	1.37%	1.57%	1.63%	0.00%	0.24%	1.10%	0.42%	0.21%	0.18%	0.23%
SEI Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc	0.63%	1.04%	1.67%	5.65%	4.23%	6.41%	5.16%	2.89%	0.83%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

SEI vs. EQT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc and EQT Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

SEI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc reported a gross profit of 72.72M and revenue of 196.24M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.1%.

EQT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EQT Corporation reported a gross profit of 3.32B and revenue of 3.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 98.4%.

SEI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc reported an operating income of 50.56M and revenue of 196.24M, resulting in an operating margin of 25.8%.

EQT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EQT Corporation reported an operating income of 2.04B and revenue of 3.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 60.3%.

SEI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc reported a net income of 21.44M and revenue of 196.24M, resulting in a net margin of 10.9%.

EQT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EQT Corporation reported a net income of 1.55B and revenue of 3.38B, resulting in a net margin of 46.0%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SEI and EQT in my portfolio?

SEI and EQT have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SEI or EQT?

SEI has higher volatility (22.03%) compared to EQT (6.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEI dropped -79.49% vs EQT's -91.51%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SEI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.