SEF vs. NOBL
SEF (ProShares Short Financials) and NOBL (ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SEF is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (-100%), while NOBL is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SEF returned -12.50%/yr vs 10.02%/yr for NOBL. At a correlation of -0.81, they often move in opposite directions. SEF charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NOBL.
Performance
SEF vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEF achieves a 2.28% return, which is significantly lower than NOBL's 6.93% return. Over the past 10 years, SEF has underperformed NOBL with an annualized return of -12.50%, while NOBL has yielded a comparatively higher 10.02% annualized return.
SEF
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- -4.01%
- YTD
- 2.28%
- 6M
- 4.12%
- 1Y
- -1.58%
- 3Y*
- -12.24%
- 5Y*
- -6.67%
- 10Y*
- -12.50%
NOBL
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 2.70%
- YTD
- 6.93%
- 6M
- 5.89%
- 1Y
- 12.41%
- 3Y*
- 8.66%
- 5Y*
- 6.13%
- 10Y*
- 10.02%
SEF vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEF ProShares Short Financials | 2.28% | -9.82% | -17.81% | -8.81% | 11.85% | -27.02% | -16.93% | -23.51% | 10.34% | -17.12% |
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 6.93% | 6.84% | 6.72% | 8.09% | -6.52% | 25.46% | 8.35% | 27.39% | -3.26% | 21.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between SEF and NOBL is -0.61, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2013 | -0.81 |
The correlation between SEF and NOBL shifts across timeframes, from -0.81 (all time) to -0.61 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SEF vs. NOBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SEF
NOBL
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
SEF
NOBL
Basic Materials
SEF
-
NOBL
Communication Services
SEF
-
NOBL
-
Consumer Cyclical
SEF
-
NOBL
Consumer Defensive
SEF
-
NOBL
Energy
SEF
-
NOBL
Healthcare
SEF
-
NOBL
Industrials
SEF
-
NOBL
Real Estate
SEF
-
NOBL
Technology
SEF
-
NOBL
Utilities
SEF
-
NOBL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEF vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank
SEF
NOBL
SEF vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Financials (SEF) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SEF | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.19 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.14 | 1.37 | -1.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.33 | 3.47 | -3.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SEF vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEF drawdown since its inception was -96.51%, which is greater than NOBL's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEF and NOBL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEF | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.51% | -35.43% | -61.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.14% | -9.11% | -2.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.40% | -15.36% | -24.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.62% | -17.92% | -23.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.66% | -35.43% | -40.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.33% | -2.89% | -93.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.74% | -3.48% | -79.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.76% | 3.59% | +1.17% |
Volatility
SEF vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Short Financials (SEF) has a higher volatility of 4.05% compared to ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) at 3.31%. This indicates that SEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SEF | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.05% | 3.31% | +0.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.16% | 8.22% | +2.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.46% | 11.47% | +2.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.97% | 14.38% | +3.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.48% | 16.60% | +3.88% |
SEF vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEF has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SEF vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison
SEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.56%, more than NOBL's 2.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 2.05% | 2.14% | 2.05% | 2.09% | 1.94% | 1.89% | 2.14% | 1.89% | 2.37% | 1.74% | 2.13% | 2.02% |
SEF ProShares Short Financials | 3.56% | 4.33% | 5.72% | 4.43% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.12% | 1.25% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SEF and NOBL have a correlation of -0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SEF has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to NOBL (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEF dropped -96.51% vs NOBL's -35.43%.
On 10-year performance, NOBL leads with 10.02% vs -12.50% for SEF. On fees, NOBL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, NOBL has been the lower-risk option at 3.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, NOBL has performed better with a 10.02% return vs -12.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NOBL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SEF.
SEF has the higher dividend yield at 3.56%, compared with 2.05% for NOBL.
SEF is categorized as Inverse Equities, while NOBL is Dividend. SEF tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (-100%), while NOBL tracks S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SEF and 0.35% for NOBL.
NOBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SEF and NOBL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer