SEF vs. CRCD
SEF (ProShares Short Financials) and CRCD (T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. SEF is passively managed, while CRCD is actively managed. Their 0.26 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SEF charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for CRCD.
Performance
SEF vs. CRCD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEF achieves a -2.43% return, which is significantly higher than CRCD's -82.71% return.
SEF
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -2.18%
- 6M
- -5.14%
- YTD
- -2.43%
- 1Y
- -7.05%
- 3Y*
- -11.58%
- 5Y*
- -7.41%
- 10Y*
- -12.37%
- ALL TIME*
- -13.88%
CRCD
- 1D
- 4.76%
- 1M
- -8.47%
- 6M
- -87.34%
- YTD
- -82.71%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $6.16M | $8.34M | $16.64M | |
| $302.73K | $217.23K | $276.76K |
SEF vs. CRCD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SEF ProShares Short Financials | -2.43% | -1.48% |
CRCD T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF | -82.71% | 38.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between SEF and CRCD is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2025 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEF vs. CRCD — Risk / Return Rank
SEF
CRCD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SEF vs. CRCD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Financials (SEF) and T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF (CRCD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SEF | CRCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.34 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.84 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SEF vs. CRCD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEF drawdown since its inception was -96.53%, roughly equal to the maximum CRCD drawdown of -96.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEF and CRCD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEF | CRCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.53% | -96.95% | +0.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.98% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.98% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.36% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.50% | -91.80% | -4.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.82% | -61.66% | -21.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.40% | — | — |
Volatility
SEF vs. CRCD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SEF | CRCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.01% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.02% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.64% | 198.91% | -184.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.91% | 198.91% | -181.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.46% | 198.91% | -178.45% |
SEF vs. CRCD - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEF has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than CRCD's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
SEF vs. CRCD - Dividend Comparison
SEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, while CRCD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRCD T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SEF ProShares Short Financials | 3.44% | 4.33% | 5.72% | 4.43% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.12% | 1.25% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SEF and CRCD have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SEF is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SEF is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CRCD.
SEF has the higher dividend yield at 3.44%, compared with 0.00% for CRCD.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SEF and 1.50% for CRCD.
Find the right allocation for SEF and CRCD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer