SCHV vs. VO
SCHV (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF) and VO (Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index, while VO is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHV returned 10.94%/yr vs 11.23%/yr for VO. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCHV charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VO.
Performance
SCHV vs. VO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHV achieves a 14.69% return, which is significantly higher than VO's 10.92% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SCHV having a 10.94% annualized return and VO not far ahead at 11.23%.
SCHV
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- -2.19%
- 6M
- 9.69%
- YTD
- 14.69%
- 1Y
- 22.64%
- 3Y*
- 16.15%
- 5Y*
- 10.49%
- 10Y*
- 10.94%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.54%
VO
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- 6M
- 7.17%
- YTD
- 10.92%
- 1Y
- 13.90%
- 3Y*
- 13.82%
- 5Y*
- 7.77%
- 10Y*
- 11.23%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.28%
SCHV vs. VO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF | 14.69% | 16.02% | 14.13% | 8.93% | -7.65% | 25.58% | 2.64% | 25.92% | -7.30% | 16.56% |
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 10.92% | 11.62% | 15.31% | 16.03% | -18.73% | 24.70% | 18.10% | 30.98% | -9.24% | 19.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHV and VO is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2009 | 0.91 |
The correlation between SCHV and VO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCHV vs. VO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHV
VO
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
SCHV
VO
Financial Services
SCHV
VO
Industrials
SCHV
VO
Healthcare
SCHV
VO
Consumer Defensive
SCHV
VO
Consumer Cyclical
SCHV
VO
Energy
SCHV
VO
Utilities
SCHV
VO
Real Estate
SCHV
VO
Basic Materials
SCHV
VO
Communication Services
SCHV
VO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHV vs. VO — Risk / Return Rank
SCHV
VO
SCHV vs. VO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHV | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.20 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.33 | 1.71 | +1.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.95 | 6.44 | +6.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHV vs. VO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHV drawdown since its inception was -37.08%, smaller than the maximum VO drawdown of -58.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHV and VO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHV | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.08% | -58.87% | +21.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.83% | -8.17% | +1.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.26% | -19.02% | +3.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.78% | -27.57% | +7.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.08% | -39.37% | +2.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.42% | -1.26% | -2.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.81% | -7.82% | +4.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.75% | 2.16% | -0.41% |
Volatility
SCHV vs. VO - Volatility Comparison
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) has a higher volatility of 3.33% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) at 2.21%. This indicates that SCHV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHV | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.33% | 2.21% | +1.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.87% | 9.64% | -0.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.21% | 12.67% | -1.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.52% | 17.60% | -3.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.92% | 18.87% | -1.95% |
SCHV vs. VO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is higher than VO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHV vs. VO - Dividend Comparison
SCHV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, more than VO's 1.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF | 1.82% | 2.02% | 2.25% | 2.42% | 2.37% | 1.93% | 3.03% | 3.02% | 3.05% | 2.37% | 2.65% | 2.69% |
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 1.34% | 1.52% | 1.49% | 1.52% | 1.60% | 1.12% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.82% | 1.35% | 1.45% | 1.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, SCHV and VO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCHV has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to VO (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHV dropped -37.08% vs VO's -58.87%.
On 10-year performance, VO leads with 11.23% vs 10.94% for SCHV. On fees, VO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VO has been the lower-risk option at 2.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VO has performed better with a 11.23% return vs 10.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for SCHV.
SCHV has the higher dividend yield at 1.82%, compared with 1.34% for VO.
SCHV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while VO is Mid Cap Blend Equities. SCHV tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index, while VO tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHV and 0.03% for VO.
SCHV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHV and VO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer