SCHG vs. XLY
SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) and XLY (Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index, while XLY is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHG returned 18.50%/yr vs 12.78%/yr for XLY. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCHG charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for XLY.
Performance
SCHG vs. XLY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHG achieves a 2.58% return, which is significantly higher than XLY's -2.16% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHG has outperformed XLY with an annualized return of 18.50%, while XLY has yielded a comparatively lower 12.78% annualized return.
SCHG
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -3.66%
- YTD
- 2.58%
- 6M
- 2.96%
- 1Y
- 20.32%
- 3Y*
- 22.68%
- 5Y*
- 14.33%
- 10Y*
- 18.50%
XLY
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -1.74%
- YTD
- -2.16%
- 6M
- -3.01%
- 1Y
- 11.01%
- 3Y*
- 12.99%
- 5Y*
- 7.00%
- 10Y*
- 12.78%
SCHG vs. XLY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 2.58% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 28.11% | 39.14% | 36.02% | -1.36% | 28.05% |
XLY Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund | -2.16% | 7.37% | 26.51% | 39.64% | -36.27% | 27.93% | 29.63% | 28.39% | 1.58% | 22.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHG and XLY is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2009 | 0.86 |
The correlation between SCHG and XLY shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SCHG vs. XLY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHG
XLY
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
SCHG
XLY
Communication Services
SCHG
XLY
Consumer Cyclical
SCHG
XLY
Healthcare
SCHG
XLY
-
Financial Services
SCHG
XLY
-
Industrials
SCHG
XLY
Consumer Defensive
SCHG
XLY
-
Basic Materials
SCHG
XLY
-
Energy
SCHG
XLY
-
Real Estate
SCHG
XLY
-
Utilities
SCHG
XLY
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHG vs. XLY — Risk / Return Rank
SCHG
XLY
SCHG vs. XLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) and Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHG | XLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.10 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.14 | 0.67 | +0.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.78 | 2.05 | +1.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHG vs. XLY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHG drawdown since its inception was -34.59%, smaller than the maximum XLY drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHG and XLY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHG | XLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.59% | -59.05% | +24.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.41% | -14.98% | -1.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.39% | -26.01% | +2.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.59% | -39.67% | +5.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.59% | -39.67% | +5.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.33% | -6.17% | +0.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.20% | -9.55% | +4.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.96% | 4.88% | +0.08% |
Volatility
SCHG vs. XLY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) is 5.14%, while Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) has a volatility of 6.19%. This indicates that SCHG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHG | XLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.14% | 6.19% | -1.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.30% | 13.44% | -1.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.95% | 18.27% | -2.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.33% | 23.83% | -1.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.58% | 22.08% | -0.50% |
SCHG vs. XLY - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than XLY's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHG vs. XLY - Dividend Comparison
SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than XLY's 0.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.38% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
XLY Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund | 0.77% | 0.79% | 0.72% | 0.78% | 1.00% | 0.53% | 0.82% | 1.28% | 1.34% | 1.20% | 1.71% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHG and XLY have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLY has higher volatility (6.19%) compared to SCHG (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHG dropped -34.59% vs XLY's -59.05%.
On 10-year performance, SCHG leads with 18.50% vs 12.78% for XLY. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHG has been the lower-risk option at 5.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 18.50% return vs 12.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for XLY.
XLY has the higher dividend yield at 0.77%, compared with 0.38% for SCHG.
SCHG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while XLY is Consumer Discretionary Equities. SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index, while XLY tracks Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHG and 0.13% for XLY.
SCHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.18 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHG and XLY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer