SCHG vs. QQQM
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM).
SCHG and QQQM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Total Return Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009. QQQM is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Oct 13, 2020. Both SCHG and QQQM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SCHG or QQQM.
Correlation
The correlation between SCHG and QQQM is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
SCHG vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
SCHG:
2.22
QQQM:
1.65
SCHG:
2.86
QQQM:
2.20
SCHG:
1.40
QQQM:
1.30
SCHG:
3.13
QQQM:
2.17
SCHG:
12.34
QQQM:
7.84
SCHG:
3.14%
QQQM:
3.76%
SCHG:
17.45%
QQQM:
17.81%
SCHG:
-34.59%
QQQM:
-35.05%
SCHG:
-2.75%
QQQM:
-3.60%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHG achieves a 37.04% return, which is significantly higher than QQQM's 27.34% return.
SCHG
37.04%
3.40%
12.88%
37.14%
20.24%
16.77%
QQQM
27.34%
3.10%
8.44%
27.94%
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SCHG vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SCHG vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SCHG vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison
SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than QQQM's 0.45% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.41% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% | 1.09% | 1.07% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.45% | 0.65% | 0.83% | 0.40% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SCHG vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHG drawdown since its inception was -34.59%, roughly equal to the maximum QQQM drawdown of -35.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHG and QQQM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SCHG vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) have volatilities of 5.07% and 5.28%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.