SCHG vs. SPYG
SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) and SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index, while SPYG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHG returned 18.63%/yr vs 18.03%/yr for SPYG. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.04% expense ratio.
Performance
SCHG vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHG achieves a 1.23% return, which is significantly lower than SPYG's 8.49% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SCHG having a 18.63% annualized return and SPYG not far behind at 18.03%.
SCHG
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -4.04%
- YTD
- 1.23%
- 6M
- -0.27%
- 1Y
- 16.03%
- 3Y*
- 22.08%
- 5Y*
- 13.26%
- 10Y*
- 18.63%
SPYG
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -2.26%
- YTD
- 8.49%
- 6M
- 6.97%
- 1Y
- 24.78%
- 3Y*
- 25.40%
- 5Y*
- 14.06%
- 10Y*
- 18.03%
SCHG vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 1.23% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 28.11% | 39.14% | 36.02% | -1.36% | 28.05% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 8.49% | 22.09% | 35.99% | 30.02% | -29.41% | 32.01% | 33.46% | 30.84% | -0.12% | 27.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHG and SPYG is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2009 | 0.98 |
The correlation between SCHG and SPYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCHG vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHG
SPYG
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
SCHG
SPYG
Communication Services
SCHG
SPYG
Consumer Cyclical
SCHG
SPYG
Healthcare
SCHG
SPYG
Financial Services
SCHG
SPYG
Industrials
SCHG
SPYG
Consumer Defensive
SCHG
SPYG
Basic Materials
SCHG
SPYG
Energy
SCHG
SPYG
Real Estate
SCHG
SPYG
Utilities
SCHG
SPYG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHG vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank
SCHG
SPYG
SCHG vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHG | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.26 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.98 | 1.81 | -0.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.19 | 7.15 | -3.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHG vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHG drawdown since its inception was -34.59%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHG and SPYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHG | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.59% | -67.63% | +33.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.41% | -13.76% | -2.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.39% | -22.14% | -1.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.59% | -32.67% | -1.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.59% | -32.67% | -1.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.57% | -5.71% | -0.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.20% | -24.28% | +19.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.03% | 3.48% | +1.55% |
Volatility
SCHG vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) is 5.90%, while State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) has a volatility of 7.26%. This indicates that SCHG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHG | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.90% | 7.26% | -1.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.46% | 13.85% | -1.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.21% | 17.22% | -1.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.38% | 21.36% | +1.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.58% | 20.72% | +0.86% |
SCHG vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SCHG and SPYG have an expense ratio of 0.04%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHG vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison
SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than SPYG's 0.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.38% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.50% | 0.52% | 0.60% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.62% | 0.90% | 1.37% | 1.51% | 1.41% | 1.55% | 1.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, SCHG and SPYG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SPYG has higher volatility (7.26%) compared to SCHG (5.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHG dropped -34.59% vs SPYG's -67.63%.
On 10-year performance, SCHG leads with 18.63% vs 18.03% for SPYG. Both ETFs have the same 0.04% expense ratio. On volatility, SCHG has been the lower-risk option at 5.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 18.63% return vs 18.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHG and SPYG have the same expense ratio: 0.04% per year.
SPYG has the higher dividend yield at 0.50%, compared with 0.38% for SCHG.
SCHG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPYG is S&P 500. SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index, while SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and State Street.
SPYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHG and SPYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer