PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHG vs. SPYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHG vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHG achieves a 7.11% return, which is significantly lower than SPYG's 12.43% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SCHG having a 18.33% annualized return and SPYG not far behind at 17.52%.


SCHG

1D
2.02%
1M
2.17%
6M
8.95%
YTD
7.11%
1Y
18.50%
3Y*
23.37%
5Y*
13.47%
10Y*
18.33%
ALL TIME*
16.47%

SPYG

1D
2.15%
1M
2.10%
6M
11.46%
YTD
12.43%
1Y
24.33%
3Y*
25.98%
5Y*
13.61%
10Y*
17.52%
ALL TIME*
7.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$249.58M$250.01M$339.80M
$323.67M$273.71M$308.17M

SCHG vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
7.11%17.50%34.95%50.10%-31.80%28.11%39.14%36.02%-1.36%28.05%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
12.43%22.09%35.99%30.02%-29.41%32.01%33.46%30.84%-0.12%27.24%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHG and SPYG is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2009

0.97

The correlation between SCHG and SPYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCHG vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHG
SPYG

Technology

44.0%
52.3%

Communication Services

14.1%
15.6%

Consumer Cyclical

11.2%
8.6%

Healthcare

9.9%
6.2%

Financial Services

7.7%
8.7%

Industrials

7.6%
6.4%

Consumer Defensive

1.9%
1.0%

Basic Materials

1.6%
0.3%

Energy

0.9%
0.1%

Real Estate

0.6%
0.6%

Utilities

0.5%
0.4%

Technology

SCHG
44.0%
SPYG
52.3%

Communication Services

SCHG
14.1%
SPYG
15.6%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHG
11.2%
SPYG
8.6%

Healthcare

SCHG
9.9%
SPYG
6.2%

Financial Services

SCHG
7.7%
SPYG
8.7%

Industrials

SCHG
7.6%
SPYG
6.4%

Consumer Defensive

SCHG
1.9%
SPYG
1.0%

Basic Materials

SCHG
1.6%
SPYG
0.3%

Energy

SCHG
0.9%
SPYG
0.1%

Real Estate

SCHG
0.6%
SPYG
0.6%

Utilities

SCHG
0.5%
SPYG
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHG vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYG
SPYG Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
SPYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYG Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYG Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SCHG vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCHGSPYGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.24

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.13

1.78

-0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.58

6.45

-2.87

SCHG vs. SPYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHG Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is comparable to the SPYG Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHG and SPYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCHG vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHG drawdown since its inception was -34.59%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHG and SPYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHGSPYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.59%

-67.63%

+33.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.41%

-13.76%

-2.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.39%

-22.14%

-1.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.59%

-32.67%

-1.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.59%

-32.67%

-1.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.15%

-2.28%

+1.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.19%

-24.20%

+19.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.19%

3.78%

+1.41%

Volatility

SCHG vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) is 4.76%, while State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) has a volatility of 6.35%. This indicates that SCHG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHGSPYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.76%

6.35%

-1.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.02%

14.96%

-1.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.66%

18.23%

-1.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.45%

21.53%

+0.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.60%

20.81%

+0.79%

SCHG vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SCHG and SPYG have an expense ratio of 0.04%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHG vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison

SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than SPYG's 0.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.38%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.48%0.52%0.60%1.15%1.03%0.62%0.90%1.37%1.51%1.41%1.55%1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, SCHG and SPYG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SPYG has higher volatility (6.35%) compared to SCHG (4.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHG dropped -34.59% vs SPYG's -67.63%.

On 10-year performance, SCHG leads with 18.33% vs 17.52% for SPYG. Both ETFs have the same 0.04% expense ratio. On volatility, SCHG has been the lower-risk option at 4.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 18.33% return vs 17.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHG and SPYG have the same expense ratio: 0.04% per year.

SPYG has the higher dividend yield at 0.48%, compared with 0.38% for SCHG.

SCHG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPYG is S&P 500. SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index, while SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and State Street.

SPYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHG and SPYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer