PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHG vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHG vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHG achieves a 7.11% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 24.36% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHG has outperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 18.33%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively lower 12.70% annualized return.


SCHG

1D
2.02%
1M
2.17%
6M
8.95%
YTD
7.11%
1Y
18.50%
3Y*
23.37%
5Y*
13.47%
10Y*
18.33%
ALL TIME*
16.47%

SCHD

1D
0.27%
1M
3.61%
6M
13.71%
YTD
24.36%
1Y
31.89%
3Y*
14.88%
5Y*
9.66%
10Y*
12.70%
ALL TIME*
13.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$806.58M$724.91M$690.35M
$249.58M$250.01M$339.80M

SCHG vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
7.11%17.50%34.95%50.10%-31.80%28.11%39.14%36.02%-1.36%28.05%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
24.36%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHG and SCHD is 0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011

0.65

Over the past year, the correlation between SCHG and SCHD has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SCHG vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHG
SCHD

Technology

44.0%
12.7%

Communication Services

14.1%
6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

11.2%
7.7%

Healthcare

9.9%
20.8%

Financial Services

7.7%
9.9%

Industrials

7.6%
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

1.9%
20.6%

Basic Materials

1.6%
1.2%

Energy

0.9%
14.1%

Real Estate

0.6%

-

Utilities

0.5%
0.1%

Technology

SCHG
44.0%
SCHD
12.7%

Communication Services

SCHG
14.1%
SCHD
6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHG
11.2%
SCHD
7.7%

Healthcare

SCHG
9.9%
SCHD
20.8%

Financial Services

SCHG
7.7%
SCHD
9.9%

Industrials

SCHG
7.6%
SCHD
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

SCHG
1.9%
SCHD
20.6%

Basic Materials

SCHG
1.6%
SCHD
1.2%

Energy

SCHG
0.9%
SCHD
14.1%

Real Estate

SCHG
0.6%
SCHD

-

Utilities

SCHG
0.5%
SCHD
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHG vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SCHG vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCHGSCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.52

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.13

6.94

-5.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.58

17.53

-13.95

SCHG vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHG Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is lower than the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHG and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCHG vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHG drawdown since its inception was -34.59%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHD drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHG and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHGSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.59%

-33.37%

-1.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.41%

-4.61%

-11.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.39%

-16.13%

-7.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.59%

-16.85%

-17.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.59%

-33.37%

-1.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.15%

-0.97%

-0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.19%

-3.29%

-1.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.19%

1.82%

+3.37%

Volatility

SCHG vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a higher volatility of 4.76% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 3.82%. This indicates that SCHG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHGSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.76%

3.82%

+0.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.02%

7.99%

+5.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.66%

11.06%

+5.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.45%

14.39%

+8.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.60%

16.73%

+4.87%

SCHG vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHG vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than SCHD's 3.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.12%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.38%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHG and SCHD have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHG has higher volatility (4.76%) compared to SCHD (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHG dropped -34.59% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

On 10-year performance, SCHG leads with 18.33% vs 12.70% for SCHD. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 3.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 18.33% return vs 12.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for SCHD.

SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.12%, compared with 0.38% for SCHG.

SCHG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHG and 0.06% for SCHD.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHG and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer