SBIL vs. ASHR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SBIL (Simplify Government Money Market ETF) and ASHR (Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - SBIL is a Money Market fund actively managed by Simplify, while ASHR is a China Equities fund tracking the CSI 300 Index. SBIL is actively managed, while ASHR is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. SBIL charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ASHR.

Performance

SBIL vs. ASHR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Government Money Market ETF (SBIL) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBIL achieves a 1.51% return, which is significantly lower than ASHR's 10.11% return.

SBIL

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.29%
• YTD: 1.51%
• 6M: 1.80%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ASHR

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: 3.02%
• YTD: 10.11%
• 6M: 13.67%
• 1Y: 39.07%
• 3Y*: 12.07%
• 5Y*: -1.24%
• 10Y*: 5.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SBIL vs. ASHR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SBIL Simplify Government Money Market ETF	1.51%	1.88%
ASHR Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund	10.11%	19.23%

Correlation

The correlation between SBIL and ASHR is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025	-0.07

Return for Risk

SBIL vs. ASHR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASHR

ASHR Risk / Return Rank: 75
ASHR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
ASHR Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
ASHR Omega Ratio Rank: 67
ASHR Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
ASHR Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBIL vs. ASHR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Government Money Market ETF (SBIL) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SBIL	ASHR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.33	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.05	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.22	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	14.09	0.23	+13.86

Drawdowns

SBIL vs. ASHR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBIL drawdown since its inception was -0.03%, smaller than the maximum ASHR drawdown of -51.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBIL and ASHR.

Drawdown Indicators

	SBIL	ASHR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.03%	-51.30%	+51.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.69%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-33.12%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-45.76%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-51.30%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-15.63%	+15.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.00%	-29.18%	+29.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.49%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SBIL	ASHR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.87%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.53%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.28%	16.84%	-16.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.28%	23.89%	-23.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.28%	24.06%	-23.78%

SBIL vs. ASHR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SBIL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than ASHR's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

SBIL vs. ASHR - Dividend Comparison

SBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, more than ASHR's 2.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ASHR Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund	2.10%	2.31%	1.13%	2.48%	1.13%	0.88%	0.81%	0.98%	1.32%	0.84%	0.73%	30.13%
SBIL Simplify Government Money Market ETF	3.26%	1.79%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SBIL and ASHR in my portfolio?

SBIL and ASHR have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SBIL or ASHR?

On fees, SBIL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SBIL or ASHR?

SBIL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ASHR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SBIL or ASHR?

SBIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 2.10% for ASHR.

What is the main difference between SBIL and ASHR?

SBIL is categorized as Money Market, while ASHR is China Equities. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SBIL and 0.65% for ASHR.