PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SBIL vs. TUA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SBIL vs. TUA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Government Money Market ETF (SBIL) and Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF (TUA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBIL achieves a 2.09% return, which is significantly higher than TUA's -6.37% return.


SBIL

1D
0.02%
1M
0.31%
6M
1.75%
YTD
2.09%
1Y
3.85%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.84%

TUA

1D
-0.32%
1M
-1.10%
6M
-5.88%
YTD
-6.37%
1Y
-5.24%
3Y*
0.67%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-1.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$31.14M$24.02M$26.67M
$11.89M$10.24M$8.33M

SBIL vs. TUA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SBIL and TUA is 0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SBIL vs. TUA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SBIL
SBIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
SBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
SBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

TUA
TUA Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
TUA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TUA Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
TUA Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
TUA Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
TUA Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SBIL vs. TUA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Government Money Market ETF (SBIL) and Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF (TUA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SBILTUADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+15.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+58.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

12.98

0.94

+12.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

154.53

-0.37

+154.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

868.15

-0.81

+868.96

SBIL vs. TUA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBIL Sharpe Ratio is 15.08, which is higher than the TUA Sharpe Ratio of -0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBIL and TUA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SBIL vs. TUA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBIL drawdown since its inception was -0.03%, smaller than the maximum TUA drawdown of -15.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBIL and TUA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SBILTUADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.03%

-15.85%

+15.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.02%

-7.96%

+7.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-10.99%

+10.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-8.45%

+8.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

3.64%

-3.64%

Volatility

SBIL vs. TUA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Simplify Government Money Market ETF (SBIL) is 0.05%, while Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF (TUA) has a volatility of 1.91%. This indicates that SBIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TUA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SBILTUADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.05%

1.91%

-1.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.18%

5.57%

-5.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26%

7.01%

-6.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.26%

10.65%

-10.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.26%

10.65%

-10.39%

SBIL vs. TUA - Expense Ratio Comparison

SBIL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than TUA's 0.16% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SBIL vs. TUA - Dividend Comparison

SBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, more than TUA's 3.12% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
SBIL
Simplify Government Money Market ETF
3.87%1.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TUA
Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF
3.12%3.84%5.19%4.83%0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


SBIL and TUA have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TUA has higher volatility (1.91%) compared to SBIL (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBIL dropped -0.03% vs TUA's -15.85%.

On 1-year performance, SBIL leads with 3.85% vs -5.24% for TUA. On fees, SBIL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SBIL has performed better with a 3.85% return vs -5.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SBIL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for TUA.

SBIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.87%, compared with 3.12% for TUA.

SBIL is categorized as Money Market, while TUA is Intermediate Core Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SBIL and 0.16% for TUA.

SBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (15.08 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SBIL and TUA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer