SBIL vs. BIL
SBIL (Simplify Government Money Market ETF) and BIL (SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SBIL is a Money Market fund actively managed by Simplify, while BIL is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. SBIL is actively managed, while BIL is passively managed. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SBIL charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for BIL.
Performance
SBIL vs. BIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with SBIL at 1.66% and BIL at 1.66%.
SBIL
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 1.66%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BIL
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 1.66%
- 6M
- 1.75%
- 1Y
- 3.85%
- 3Y*
- 4.60%
- 5Y*
- 3.45%
- 10Y*
- 2.20%
SBIL vs. BIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SBIL Simplify Government Money Market ETF | 1.66% | 1.88% |
BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 1.66% | 1.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between SBIL and BIL is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SBIL vs. BIL — Risk / Return Rank
SBIL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BIL
SBIL vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Government Money Market ETF (SBIL) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SBIL | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 87.41 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 353.28 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2,801.35 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SBIL vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBIL drawdown since its inception was -0.03%, smaller than the maximum BIL drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBIL and BIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBIL | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.03% | -0.78% | +0.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.09% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -0.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.00% | -0.26% | +0.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.00% | — |
Volatility
SBIL vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SBIL | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.07% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.14% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27% | 0.20% | +0.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.27% | 0.26% | +0.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.27% | 0.26% | +0.01% |
SBIL vs. BIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SBIL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than BIL's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SBIL vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison
SBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, less than BIL's 3.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 3.85% | 4.13% | 5.03% | 4.92% | 1.35% | 0.00% | 0.30% | 2.05% | 1.66% | 0.68% | 0.07% |
SBIL Simplify Government Money Market ETF | 3.25% | 1.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SBIL and BIL have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BIL is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BIL is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SBIL.
BIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.85%, compared with 3.25% for SBIL.
SBIL is categorized as Money Market, while BIL is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SBIL and 0.14% for BIL.
Find the right allocation for SBIL and BIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer