SBIL vs. SGVT

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

SBIL (Simplify Government Money Market ETF) and SGVT (Schwab Government Money Market ETF) are both Money Market funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SBIL charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for SGVT.

Performance

SBIL vs. SGVT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Government Money Market ETF (SBIL) and Schwab Government Money Market ETF (SGVT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SBIL having a 1.66% return and SGVT slightly lower at 1.58%.

SBIL

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.24%
• YTD: 1.66%
• 6M: 1.74%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SGVT

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.23%
• YTD: 1.58%
• 6M: 1.67%
• 1Y: 3.73%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SBIL vs. SGVT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SBIL Simplify Government Money Market ETF	1.66%	1.88%
SGVT Schwab Government Money Market ETF	1.58%	1.86%

Correlation

The correlation between SBIL and SGVT is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025	0.23

Return for Risk

SBIL vs. SGVT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBIL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SGVT

SGVT Risk / Return Rank: 100
SGVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
SGVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
SGVT Omega Ratio Rank: 100
SGVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
SGVT Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBIL vs. SGVT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Government Money Market ETF (SBIL) and Schwab Government Money Market ETF (SGVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SBIL	SGVT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	17.39	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	83.20	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	29.30	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	138.57	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	1,254.38	—

Drawdowns

SBIL vs. SGVT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBIL drawdown since its inception was -0.03%, roughly equal to the maximum SGVT drawdown of -0.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBIL and SGVT.

Drawdown Indicators

	SBIL	SGVT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.03%	-0.03%	0.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.03%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.02%	+0.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.00%	-0.00%	0.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.00%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SBIL	SGVT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.10%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.15%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27%	0.22%	+0.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.27%	0.22%	+0.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.27%	0.22%	+0.05%

SBIL vs. SGVT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SBIL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SGVT's 0.28% expense ratio.

Dividends

SBIL vs. SGVT - Dividend Comparison

SBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, more than SGVT's 3.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
SBIL Simplify Government Money Market ETF	3.25%	1.79%
SGVT Schwab Government Money Market ETF	3.11%	1.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SBIL and SGVT in my portfolio?

SBIL and SGVT have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SBIL or SGVT?

On fees, SBIL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SBIL or SGVT?

SBIL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for SGVT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SBIL or SGVT?

SBIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.25%, compared with 3.11% for SGVT.

What is the main difference between SBIL and SGVT?

They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SBIL and 0.28% for SGVT.