RSP vs. GSEW
RSP (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF) and GSEW (Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSP is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while GSEW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Solactive US Large Cap Equal Weight Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RSP returned 8.52%/yr vs 8.93%/yr for GSEW. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. RSP charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for GSEW.
Performance
RSP vs. GSEW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with RSP having a 10.12% return and GSEW slightly higher at 10.25%.
RSP
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 3.56%
- YTD
- 10.12%
- 6M
- 11.44%
- 1Y
- 20.95%
- 3Y*
- 15.37%
- 5Y*
- 8.52%
- 10Y*
- 11.90%
GSEW
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 3.49%
- YTD
- 10.25%
- 6M
- 11.51%
- 1Y
- 20.52%
- 3Y*
- 17.69%
- 5Y*
- 8.93%
- 10Y*
- —
RSP vs. GSEW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 10.12% | 11.21% | 12.79% | 13.70% | -11.62% | 29.41% | 12.66% | 28.91% | -7.84% | 7.71% |
GSEW Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 10.25% | 11.97% | 16.89% | 17.80% | -17.54% | 25.43% | 16.28% | 31.04% | -8.11% | 7.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSP and GSEW is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2017 | 0.97 |
The correlation between RSP and GSEW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
RSP vs. GSEW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RSP
GSEW
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
RSP
GSEW
Financial Services
RSP
GSEW
Industrials
RSP
GSEW
Healthcare
RSP
GSEW
Consumer Cyclical
RSP
GSEW
Consumer Defensive
RSP
GSEW
Utilities
RSP
GSEW
Real Estate
RSP
GSEW
Energy
RSP
GSEW
Basic Materials
RSP
GSEW
Communication Services
RSP
GSEW
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSP vs. GSEW — Risk / Return Rank
RSP
GSEW
RSP vs. GSEW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) and Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSP | GSEW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.82 | 1.70 | +0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.63 | 2.42 | +0.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.30 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | 2.69 | -0.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.20 | 10.32 | -0.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSP | GSEW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.82 | 1.70 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.53 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.62 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
RSP vs. GSEW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSP drawdown since its inception was -59.92%, which is greater than GSEW's maximum drawdown of -38.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSP and GSEW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSP | GSEW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.92% | -38.65% | -21.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.85% | -7.72% | -0.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.81% | -18.18% | +0.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.38% | -25.74% | +4.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.65% | -5.89% | -0.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.06% | 2.02% | +0.04% |
Volatility
RSP vs. GSEW - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) and Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) have volatilities of 2.61% and 2.69%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSP | GSEW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.61% | 2.69% | -0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.31% | 9.05% | -0.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.56% | 12.10% | -0.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.18% | 16.91% | -0.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.36% | 19.20% | -0.84% |
RSP vs. GSEW - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSP has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than GSEW's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
RSP vs. GSEW - Dividend Comparison
RSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, more than GSEW's 1.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSEW Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 1.41% | 1.52% | 1.46% | 1.64% | 1.74% | 1.34% | 1.53% | 1.66% | 1.56% | 0.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 1.48% | 1.64% | 1.52% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 1.28% | 1.64% | 1.69% | 2.02% | 1.52% | 1.20% | 1.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, RSP and GSEW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
GSEW has higher volatility (2.69%) compared to RSP (2.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSP dropped -59.92% vs GSEW's -38.65%.
On 5-year performance, GSEW leads with 8.93% vs 8.52% for RSP. On fees, GSEW is cheaper at 0.09% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GSEW has performed better with a 8.93% return vs 8.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GSEW is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for RSP.
RSP has the higher dividend yield at 1.48%, compared with 1.41% for GSEW.
RSP is categorized as S&P 500, while GSEW is Large Cap Growth Equities. RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while GSEW tracks Solactive US Large Cap Equal Weight Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for RSP and 0.09% for GSEW.
RSP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSP and GSEW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer