PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSP vs. GSEW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSP vs. GSEW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) and Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with RSP having a 10.12% return and GSEW slightly higher at 10.25%.


RSP

1D
0.40%
1M
3.56%
YTD
10.12%
6M
11.44%
1Y
20.95%
3Y*
15.37%
5Y*
8.52%
10Y*
11.90%

GSEW

1D
0.20%
1M
3.49%
YTD
10.25%
6M
11.51%
1Y
20.52%
3Y*
17.69%
5Y*
8.93%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSP vs. GSEW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
10.12%11.21%12.79%13.70%-11.62%29.41%12.66%28.91%-7.84%7.71%
GSEW
Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
10.25%11.97%16.89%17.80%-17.54%25.43%16.28%31.04%-8.11%7.67%

Correlation

The correlation between RSP and GSEW is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2017

0.97

The correlation between RSP and GSEW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

RSP vs. GSEW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RSP
GSEW

Technology

19.6%
20.9%

Financial Services

14.5%
14.3%

Industrials

14.1%
15.6%

Healthcare

11.0%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

6.5%
5.7%

Utilities

6.1%
5.8%

Real Estate

6.0%
4.0%

Energy

4.5%
4.9%

Basic Materials

4.1%
4.6%

Communication Services

3.7%
3.5%

Technology

RSP
19.6%
GSEW
20.9%

Financial Services

RSP
14.5%
GSEW
14.3%

Industrials

RSP
14.1%
GSEW
15.6%

Healthcare

RSP
11.0%
GSEW
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

RSP
9.9%
GSEW
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

RSP
6.5%
GSEW
5.7%

Utilities

RSP
6.1%
GSEW
5.8%

Real Estate

RSP
6.0%
GSEW
4.0%

Energy

RSP
4.5%
GSEW
4.9%

Basic Materials

RSP
4.1%
GSEW
4.6%

Communication Services

RSP
3.7%
GSEW
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSP vs. GSEW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSP
RSP Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
RSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSP Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
RSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSP Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

GSEW
GSEW Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
GSEW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSEW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSEW Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
GSEW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSEW Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSP vs. GSEW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) and Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RSPGSEWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.82

1.70

+0.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.63

2.42

+0.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.30

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

2.69

-0.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.20

10.32

-0.11

RSP vs. GSEW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSP Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the GSEW Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSP and GSEW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RSPGSEWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.82

1.70

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.53

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.62

-0.05

Drawdowns

RSP vs. GSEW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSP drawdown since its inception was -59.92%, which is greater than GSEW's maximum drawdown of -38.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSP and GSEW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSPGSEWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.92%

-38.65%

-21.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.85%

-7.72%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.81%

-18.18%

+0.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.38%

-25.74%

+4.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.65%

-5.89%

-0.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

2.02%

+0.04%

Volatility

RSP vs. GSEW - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) and Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) have volatilities of 2.61% and 2.69%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSPGSEWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.61%

2.69%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.31%

9.05%

-0.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.56%

12.10%

-0.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.18%

16.91%

-0.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.36%

19.20%

-0.84%

RSP vs. GSEW - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSP has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than GSEW's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

RSP vs. GSEW - Dividend Comparison

RSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, more than GSEW's 1.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSEW
Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
1.41%1.52%1.46%1.64%1.74%1.34%1.53%1.66%1.56%0.54%0.00%0.00%
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
1.48%1.64%1.52%1.64%1.82%1.28%1.64%1.69%2.02%1.52%1.20%1.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, RSP and GSEW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GSEW has higher volatility (2.69%) compared to RSP (2.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSP dropped -59.92% vs GSEW's -38.65%.

On 5-year performance, GSEW leads with 8.93% vs 8.52% for RSP. On fees, GSEW is cheaper at 0.09% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GSEW has performed better with a 8.93% return vs 8.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GSEW is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for RSP.

RSP has the higher dividend yield at 1.48%, compared with 1.41% for GSEW.

RSP is categorized as S&P 500, while GSEW is Large Cap Growth Equities. RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while GSEW tracks Solactive US Large Cap Equal Weight Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for RSP and 0.09% for GSEW.

RSP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSP and GSEW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer