RSP vs. VTI
RSP (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF) and VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSP is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while VTI is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Total Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RSP returned 12.15%/yr vs 15.02%/yr for VTI. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RSP charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTI.
Performance
RSP vs. VTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSP achieves a 10.96% return, which is significantly higher than VTI's 9.62% return. Over the past 10 years, RSP has underperformed VTI with an annualized return of 12.15%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively higher 15.02% annualized return.
RSP
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- 5.01%
- YTD
- 10.96%
- 6M
- 10.34%
- 1Y
- 21.34%
- 3Y*
- 14.66%
- 5Y*
- 8.59%
- 10Y*
- 12.15%
VTI
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 1.00%
- YTD
- 9.62%
- 6M
- 9.69%
- 1Y
- 26.27%
- 3Y*
- 20.60%
- 5Y*
- 12.20%
- 10Y*
- 15.02%
RSP vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 10.96% | 11.21% | 12.79% | 13.70% | -11.62% | 29.41% | 12.66% | 28.91% | -7.84% | 18.52% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 9.62% | 17.10% | 23.81% | 26.05% | -19.52% | 25.68% | 21.08% | 30.67% | -5.23% | 21.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSP and VTI is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2003 | 0.95 |
The correlation between RSP and VTI shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.95 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
RSP vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RSP
VTI
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
RSP
VTI
Industrials
RSP
VTI
Financial Services
RSP
VTI
Healthcare
RSP
VTI
Consumer Cyclical
RSP
VTI
Consumer Defensive
RSP
VTI
Real Estate
RSP
VTI
Utilities
RSP
VTI
Energy
RSP
VTI
Basic Materials
RSP
VTI
Communication Services
RSP
VTI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSP vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank
RSP
VTI
RSP vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSP | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.35 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.54 | 2.79 | -0.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.63 | 12.52 | -2.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSP vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSP drawdown since its inception was -59.92%, which is greater than VTI's maximum drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSP and VTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSP | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.92% | -55.45% | -4.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.85% | -8.92% | +1.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.81% | -19.30% | +1.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.38% | -25.36% | +3.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.04% | -35.00% | -4.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.14% | +2.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.64% | -8.02% | +1.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.07% | 1.99% | +0.08% |
Volatility
RSP vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) is 3.57%, while Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) has a volatility of 4.50%. This indicates that RSP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSP | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.57% | 4.50% | -0.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.59% | 9.82% | -1.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.83% | 12.64% | -0.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.22% | 17.47% | -1.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.36% | 18.33% | +0.03% |
RSP vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSP has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
RSP vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison
RSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, more than VTI's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 1.47% | 1.64% | 1.52% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 1.28% | 1.64% | 1.69% | 2.02% | 1.52% | 1.20% | 1.70% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.03% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSP and VTI have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VTI has higher volatility (4.50%) compared to RSP (3.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSP dropped -59.92% vs VTI's -55.45%.
On 10-year performance, VTI leads with 15.02% vs 12.15% for RSP. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, RSP has been the lower-risk option at 3.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VTI has performed better with a 15.02% return vs 12.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for RSP.
RSP has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 1.03% for VTI.
RSP is categorized as S&P 500, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for RSP and 0.03% for VTI.
VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSP and VTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer