PortfoliosLab logo
RSP vs. EUSA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between RSP and EUSA is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

RSP vs. EUSA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight ETF (RSP) and iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RSP:

0.34

EUSA:

0.39

Sortino Ratio

RSP:

0.67

EUSA:

0.73

Omega Ratio

RSP:

1.09

EUSA:

1.10

Calmar Ratio

RSP:

0.37

EUSA:

0.41

Martin Ratio

RSP:

1.37

EUSA:

1.51

Ulcer Index

RSP:

4.84%

EUSA:

4.98%

Daily Std Dev

RSP:

17.12%

EUSA:

17.54%

Max Drawdown

RSP:

-59.92%

EUSA:

-39.16%

Current Drawdown

RSP:

-7.25%

EUSA:

-7.63%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSP achieves a -1.04% return, which is significantly higher than EUSA's -1.46% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RSP having a 9.62% annualized return and EUSA not far behind at 9.47%.


RSP

YTD

-1.04%

1M

8.13%

6M

-5.48%

1Y

5.59%

5Y*

14.63%

10Y*

9.62%

EUSA

YTD

-1.46%

1M

8.03%

6M

-5.16%

1Y

6.61%

5Y*

13.67%

10Y*

9.47%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RSP vs. EUSA - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSP has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than EUSA's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

RSP vs. EUSA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RSP is 4848
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RSP is 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RSP is 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RSP is 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RSP is 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RSP is 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

EUSA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EUSA is 5252
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EUSA is 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EUSA is 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EUSA is 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EUSA is 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EUSA is 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RSP vs. EUSA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight ETF (RSP) and iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current RSP Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is comparable to the EUSA Sharpe Ratio of 0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSP and EUSA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

RSP vs. EUSA - Dividend Comparison

RSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, more than EUSA's 1.52% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
RSP
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight ETF
1.63%1.52%1.63%1.82%1.28%1.64%1.69%2.02%1.52%1.20%1.70%1.46%
EUSA
iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF
1.52%1.47%1.53%1.73%1.23%1.45%1.49%2.01%1.50%1.59%2.21%1.91%

Drawdowns

RSP vs. EUSA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSP drawdown since its inception was -59.92%, which is greater than EUSA's maximum drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSP and EUSA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

RSP vs. EUSA - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight ETF (RSP) and iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA) have volatilities of 6.16% and 6.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...