RPV vs. MGV
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF (RPV) and Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV).
RPV and MGV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RPV is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Value Index. It was launched on Mar 1, 2006. MGV is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI US Large Cap Value Index. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007. Both RPV and MGV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RPV or MGV.
Performance
RPV vs. MGV - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RPV achieves a 17.79% return, which is significantly lower than MGV's 22.16% return. Over the past 10 years, RPV has underperformed MGV with an annualized return of 7.98%, while MGV has yielded a comparatively higher 10.81% annualized return.
RPV
17.79%
6.02%
13.83%
30.05%
9.61%
7.98%
MGV
22.16%
1.33%
12.55%
29.28%
11.94%
10.81%
Key characteristics
| RPV | MGV | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.08 | 2.96 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.96 | 4.21 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.37 | 1.55 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.10 | 6.00 |
| Martin Ratio | 10.29 | 19.37 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.00% | 1.53% |
| Daily Std Dev | 14.86% | 10.00% |
| Max Drawdown | -75.32% | -56.31% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -0.39% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RPV vs. MGV - Expense Ratio Comparison
RPV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than MGV's 0.07% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between RPV and MGV is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RPV vs. MGV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF (RPV) and Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
RPV vs. MGV - Dividend Comparison
RPV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, less than MGV's 2.23% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPV Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF | 2.05% | 2.38% | 2.29% | 1.92% | 2.11% | 2.28% | 2.49% | 1.73% | 1.73% | 2.39% | 1.57% | 1.13% |
MGV Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF | 2.23% | 2.48% | 2.45% | 2.17% | 2.47% | 2.69% | 2.65% | 2.34% | 2.53% | 2.59% | 2.26% | 2.29% |
Drawdowns
RPV vs. MGV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RPV drawdown since its inception was -75.32%, which is greater than MGV's maximum drawdown of -56.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPV and MGV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
RPV vs. MGV - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF (RPV) has a higher volatility of 5.55% compared to Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) at 3.81%. This indicates that RPV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.