PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RPV vs. IUSV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RPV vs. IUSV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF (RPV) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPV achieves a 11.14% return, which is significantly higher than IUSV's 8.03% return. Over the past 10 years, RPV has underperformed IUSV with an annualized return of 10.71%, while IUSV has yielded a comparatively higher 12.08% annualized return.


RPV

1D
0.28%
1M
3.02%
YTD
11.14%
6M
13.55%
1Y
29.54%
3Y*
18.37%
5Y*
9.43%
10Y*
10.71%

IUSV

1D
0.55%
1M
1.90%
YTD
8.03%
6M
8.84%
1Y
22.41%
3Y*
15.76%
5Y*
10.64%
10Y*
12.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RPV vs. IUSV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RPV
Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF
11.14%17.70%12.41%7.98%-1.27%34.22%-8.69%24.80%-12.31%17.30%
IUSV
iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF
8.03%12.85%12.18%21.73%-5.40%25.22%1.56%31.47%-9.21%15.09%

Correlation

The correlation between RPV and IUSV is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2006

0.90

The correlation between RPV and IUSV shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.92 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RPV vs. IUSV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RPV
IUSV

Financial Services

17.9%
15.0%

Healthcare

16.2%
11.0%

Consumer Defensive

15.2%
8.8%

Energy

11.3%
7.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
11.1%

Basic Materials

9.0%
3.6%

Industrials

6.3%
11.2%

Communication Services

5.7%
3.1%

Utilities

4.0%
4.3%

Technology

2.8%
20.8%

Real Estate

1.4%
3.7%

Financial Services

RPV
17.9%
IUSV
15.0%

Healthcare

RPV
16.2%
IUSV
11.0%

Consumer Defensive

RPV
15.2%
IUSV
8.8%

Energy

RPV
11.3%
IUSV
7.2%

Consumer Cyclical

RPV
10.2%
IUSV
11.1%

Basic Materials

RPV
9.0%
IUSV
3.6%

Industrials

RPV
6.3%
IUSV
11.2%

Communication Services

RPV
5.7%
IUSV
3.1%

Utilities

RPV
4.0%
IUSV
4.3%

Technology

RPV
2.8%
IUSV
20.8%

Real Estate

RPV
1.4%
IUSV
3.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RPV vs. IUSV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RPV
RPV Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
RPV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPV Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
RPV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPV Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

IUSV
IUSV Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
IUSV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUSV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUSV Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
IUSV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUSV Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RPV vs. IUSV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF (RPV) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RPVIUSVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.35

2.26

+0.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.39

3.17

+0.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.40

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.78

3.57

+0.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.25

13.68

-0.43

RPV vs. IUSV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPV Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the IUSV Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPV and IUSV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RPVIUSVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

2.26

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.73

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.71

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.60

-0.23

Drawdowns

RPV vs. IUSV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPV drawdown since its inception was -75.32%, which is greater than IUSV's maximum drawdown of -56.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPV and IUSV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RPVIUSVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.32%

-56.88%

-18.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.74%

-6.36%

-1.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.50%

-17.76%

+2.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.64%

-17.95%

-4.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.67%

-37.54%

-13.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.14%

+0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.69%

-6.29%

-4.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

1.66%

+0.55%

Volatility

RPV vs. IUSV - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF (RPV) has a higher volatility of 2.49% compared to iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV) at 2.24%. This indicates that RPV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUSV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RPVIUSVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.49%

2.24%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.49%

7.14%

+1.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.61%

9.97%

+2.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.88%

14.55%

+3.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.92%

17.07%

+4.85%

RPV vs. IUSV - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IUSV's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

RPV vs. IUSV - Dividend Comparison

RPV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, more than IUSV's 1.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IUSV
iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF
1.67%1.78%2.15%1.75%2.22%1.87%2.40%2.19%2.67%1.93%4.44%7.63%
RPV
Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF
2.27%2.50%2.16%2.38%2.29%1.92%2.11%2.28%2.49%1.73%1.73%2.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


RPV and IUSV have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RPV has higher volatility (2.49%) compared to IUSV (2.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPV dropped -75.32% vs IUSV's -56.88%.

On 10-year performance, IUSV leads with 12.08% vs 10.71% for RPV. On fees, IUSV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, IUSV has been the lower-risk option at 2.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IUSV has performed better with a 12.08% return vs 10.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IUSV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RPV.

RPV has the higher dividend yield at 2.27%, compared with 1.67% for IUSV.

RPV tracks S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Value Index, while IUSV tracks S&P 900 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RPV and 0.04% for IUSV.

RPV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RPV and IUSV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer