RPV vs. SCHD
RPV (Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RPV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Value Index, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RPV returned 11.14%/yr vs 12.72%/yr for SCHD. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RPV charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
RPV vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RPV achieves a 10.84% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 17.72% return. Over the past 10 years, RPV has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 11.14%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.72% annualized return.
RPV
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- YTD
- 10.84%
- 6M
- 10.96%
- 1Y
- 25.73%
- 3Y*
- 17.60%
- 5Y*
- 10.53%
- 10Y*
- 11.14%
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -2.47%
- YTD
- 17.72%
- 6M
- 17.25%
- 1Y
- 24.56%
- 3Y*
- 14.60%
- 5Y*
- 8.71%
- 10Y*
- 12.72%
RPV vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPV Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF | 10.84% | 17.70% | 12.41% | 7.98% | -1.27% | 34.22% | -8.69% | 24.80% | -12.31% | 17.30% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 17.72% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between RPV and SCHD is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011 | 0.86 |
The correlation between RPV and SCHD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
RPV vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RPV
SCHD
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Industrials
Communication Services
Utilities
Technology
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
RPV
SCHD
Healthcare
RPV
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
RPV
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
RPV
SCHD
Energy
RPV
SCHD
Basic Materials
RPV
SCHD
Industrials
RPV
SCHD
Communication Services
RPV
SCHD
Utilities
RPV
SCHD
Technology
RPV
SCHD
Real Estate
RPV
SCHD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RPV vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
RPV
SCHD
RPV vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF (RPV) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RPV | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.40 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.34 | 5.35 | -2.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.48 | 12.94 | -1.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RPV vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RPV drawdown since its inception was -75.32%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPV and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RPV | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.32% | -33.37% | -41.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.74% | -4.61% | -3.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.50% | -16.13% | +0.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.64% | -16.85% | -5.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.67% | -33.37% | -17.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.85% | -2.47% | -0.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.66% | -3.31% | -7.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.25% | 1.90% | +0.35% |
Volatility
RPV vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF (RPV) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) have volatilities of 3.56% and 3.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RPV | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.56% | 3.58% | -0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.69% | 7.73% | +0.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.80% | 11.07% | +1.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.79% | 14.36% | +3.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.87% | 16.71% | +5.16% |
RPV vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
RPV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
RPV vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
RPV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%, less than SCHD's 3.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPV Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF | 2.40% | 2.50% | 2.16% | 2.38% | 2.29% | 1.92% | 2.11% | 2.28% | 2.49% | 1.73% | 1.73% | 2.39% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.30% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RPV and SCHD have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHD has higher volatility (3.58%) compared to RPV (3.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPV dropped -75.32% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.72% vs 11.14% for RPV. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.72% return vs 11.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RPV.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.30%, compared with 2.40% for RPV.
RPV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. RPV tracks S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Value Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RPV and 0.06% for SCHD.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RPV and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer