PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROUS vs. SPYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ROUS vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROUS achieves a 15.33% return, which is significantly higher than SPYG's 8.70% return. Over the past 10 years, ROUS has underperformed SPYG with an annualized return of 12.99%, while SPYG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.05% annualized return.


ROUS

1D
-0.90%
1M
0.88%
YTD
15.33%
6M
13.97%
1Y
27.51%
3Y*
19.87%
5Y*
12.64%
10Y*
12.99%

SPYG

1D
-2.40%
1M
-2.07%
YTD
8.70%
6M
7.46%
1Y
26.87%
3Y*
25.48%
5Y*
14.11%
10Y*
18.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROUS vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ROUS
Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF
15.33%15.21%17.61%15.05%-9.65%27.33%6.61%23.94%-9.59%22.88%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
8.70%22.09%35.99%30.02%-29.41%32.01%33.46%30.84%-0.12%27.24%

Correlation

The correlation between ROUS and SPYG is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2015

0.72

The correlation between ROUS and SPYG shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ROUS vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ROUS
SPYG

Technology

37.3%
52.1%

Healthcare

10.3%
5.9%

Financial Services

9.9%
9.0%

Industrials

9.8%
5.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%
8.5%

Communication Services

8.1%
15.9%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%
1.0%

Utilities

3.5%
1.2%

Energy

2.6%
0.1%

Basic Materials

2.1%
0.3%

Real Estate

2.0%
0.6%

Technology

ROUS
37.3%
SPYG
52.1%

Healthcare

ROUS
10.3%
SPYG
5.9%

Financial Services

ROUS
9.9%
SPYG
9.0%

Industrials

ROUS
9.8%
SPYG
5.4%

Consumer Cyclical

ROUS
9.1%
SPYG
8.5%

Communication Services

ROUS
8.1%
SPYG
15.9%

Consumer Defensive

ROUS
5.5%
SPYG
1.0%

Utilities

ROUS
3.5%
SPYG
1.2%

Energy

ROUS
2.6%
SPYG
0.1%

Basic Materials

ROUS
2.1%
SPYG
0.3%

Real Estate

ROUS
2.0%
SPYG
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROUS vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROUS
ROUS Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
ROUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
ROUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYG
SPYG Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
SPYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYG Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYG Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROUS vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ROUSSPYGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.28

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.63

1.96

+2.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.66

7.79

+10.87

ROUS vs. SPYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is higher than the SPYG Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROUS and SPYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ROUS vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROUS drawdown since its inception was -35.51%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROUS and SPYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROUSSPYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.51%

-67.63%

+32.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.97%

-13.76%

+7.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.81%

-22.14%

+6.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.91%

-32.67%

+13.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.51%

-32.67%

-2.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.91%

-5.52%

+3.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.22%

-24.28%

+20.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.48%

3.46%

-1.98%

Volatility

ROUS vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) is 4.01%, while State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) has a volatility of 7.26%. This indicates that ROUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROUSSPYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.01%

7.26%

-3.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.96%

13.90%

-4.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.70%

17.26%

-5.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.43%

21.36%

-6.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.99%

20.73%

-3.74%

ROUS vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROUS has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ROUS vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison

ROUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, more than SPYG's 0.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ROUS
Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF
1.34%1.52%1.62%1.91%1.88%1.38%2.01%2.12%1.89%1.54%1.97%1.62%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.50%0.52%0.60%1.15%1.03%0.62%0.90%1.37%1.51%1.41%1.55%1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


ROUS and SPYG have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPYG has higher volatility (7.26%) compared to ROUS (4.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROUS dropped -35.51% vs SPYG's -67.63%.

On 10-year performance, SPYG leads with 18.05% vs 12.99% for ROUS. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, ROUS has been the lower-risk option at 4.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 18.05% return vs 12.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for ROUS.

ROUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 0.50% for SPYG.

ROUS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPYG is S&P 500. ROUS tracks Hartford Multi-factor Large Cap Index, while SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Hartford and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ROUS and 0.04% for SPYG.

ROUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROUS and SPYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer