PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROUS vs. VSMV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ROUS vs. VSMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) and VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROUS achieves a 16.38% return, which is significantly higher than VSMV's 8.20% return.


ROUS

1D
0.54%
1M
1.79%
YTD
16.38%
6M
15.03%
1Y
30.10%
3Y*
20.23%
5Y*
12.99%
10Y*
13.10%

VSMV

1D
0.12%
1M
-1.78%
YTD
8.20%
6M
7.86%
1Y
24.37%
3Y*
15.97%
5Y*
11.45%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROUS vs. VSMV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ROUS
Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF
16.38%15.21%17.61%15.05%-9.65%27.33%6.61%23.94%-9.59%15.19%
VSMV
VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF
8.20%16.77%15.79%12.34%-7.56%25.66%5.05%26.79%-1.12%11.48%

Correlation

The correlation between ROUS and VSMV is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2017

0.83

The correlation between ROUS and VSMV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

ROUS vs. VSMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ROUS
VSMV

Technology

37.3%
38.1%

Healthcare

10.3%
14.1%

Financial Services

9.9%
7.8%

Industrials

9.8%
8.2%

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%
4.9%

Communication Services

8.1%
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%
16.1%

Utilities

3.5%
0.0%

Energy

2.6%
4.1%

Basic Materials

2.1%
1.6%

Real Estate

2.0%
0.0%

Technology

ROUS
37.3%
VSMV
38.1%

Healthcare

ROUS
10.3%
VSMV
14.1%

Financial Services

ROUS
9.9%
VSMV
7.8%

Industrials

ROUS
9.8%
VSMV
8.2%

Consumer Cyclical

ROUS
9.1%
VSMV
4.9%

Communication Services

ROUS
8.1%
VSMV
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

ROUS
5.5%
VSMV
16.1%

Utilities

ROUS
3.5%
VSMV
0.0%

Energy

ROUS
2.6%
VSMV
4.1%

Basic Materials

ROUS
2.1%
VSMV
1.6%

Real Estate

ROUS
2.0%
VSMV
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROUS vs. VSMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROUS
ROUS Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
ROUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROUS Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
ROUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROUS Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

VSMV
VSMV Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
VSMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSMV Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
VSMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSMV Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROUS vs. VSMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) and VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ROUSVSMVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.48

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.06

4.72

+0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.49

17.61

+2.88

ROUS vs. VSMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is comparable to the VSMV Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROUS and VSMV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ROUS vs. VSMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROUS drawdown since its inception was -35.51%, which is greater than VSMV's maximum drawdown of -31.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROUS and VSMV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROUSVSMVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.51%

-31.33%

-4.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.97%

-5.18%

-0.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.81%

-13.22%

-2.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.91%

-17.96%

-0.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.02%

-2.02%

+1.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.22%

-3.40%

-0.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.47%

1.39%

+0.08%

Volatility

ROUS vs. VSMV - Volatility Comparison

Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) has a higher volatility of 3.89% compared to VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV) at 3.35%. This indicates that ROUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VSMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROUSVSMVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.89%

3.35%

+0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.91%

6.68%

+2.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.68%

9.29%

+2.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.43%

12.88%

+1.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.98%

15.03%

+1.95%

ROUS vs. VSMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROUS has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than VSMV's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

ROUS vs. VSMV - Dividend Comparison

ROUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, less than VSMV's 1.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ROUS
Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF
1.32%1.52%1.62%1.91%1.88%1.38%2.01%2.12%1.89%1.54%1.97%1.62%
VSMV
VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF
1.37%1.35%1.36%1.77%1.99%1.36%2.01%2.00%2.42%1.11%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ROUS and VSMV have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ROUS has higher volatility (3.89%) compared to VSMV (3.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROUS dropped -35.51% vs VSMV's -31.33%.

On 5-year performance, ROUS leads with 12.99% vs 11.45% for VSMV. On fees, ROUS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, VSMV has been the lower-risk option at 3.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ROUS has performed better with a 12.99% return vs 11.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ROUS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for VSMV.

VSMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 1.32% for ROUS.

ROUS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VSMV is Volatility Hedged Equity. ROUS tracks Hartford Multi-factor Large Cap Index, while VSMV tracks Nasdaq Victory Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Hartford and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ROUS and 0.35% for VSMV.

VSMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROUS and VSMV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer