PortfoliosLab logo
ROUS vs. OMFL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ROUS and OMFL is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

ROUS vs. OMFL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) and Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ROUS:

0.56

OMFL:

0.08

Sortino Ratio

ROUS:

0.96

OMFL:

0.34

Omega Ratio

ROUS:

1.13

OMFL:

1.04

Calmar Ratio

ROUS:

0.62

OMFL:

0.17

Martin Ratio

ROUS:

2.39

OMFL:

0.52

Ulcer Index

ROUS:

4.10%

OMFL:

5.16%

Daily Std Dev

ROUS:

16.22%

OMFL:

18.10%

Max Drawdown

ROUS:

-35.51%

OMFL:

-33.24%

Current Drawdown

ROUS:

-5.75%

OMFL:

-5.52%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROUS achieves a 0.15% return, which is significantly higher than OMFL's 0.09% return.


ROUS

YTD

0.15%

1M

7.27%

6M

-4.61%

1Y

8.54%

5Y*

14.09%

10Y*

10.65%

OMFL

YTD

0.09%

1M

5.84%

6M

-2.12%

1Y

1.40%

5Y*

14.13%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ROUS vs. OMFL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROUS has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than OMFL's 0.29% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ROUS vs. OMFL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROUS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ROUS is 6767
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ROUS is 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ROUS is 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ROUS is 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ROUS is 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ROUS is 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

OMFL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of OMFL is 2828
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of OMFL is 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of OMFL is 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of OMFL is 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of OMFL is 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of OMFL is 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ROUS vs. OMFL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) and Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ROUS Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is higher than the OMFL Sharpe Ratio of 0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROUS and OMFL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

ROUS vs. OMFL - Dividend Comparison

ROUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, more than OMFL's 0.99% yield.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ROUS
Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF
1.69%1.62%1.91%1.88%1.38%2.01%2.12%1.89%1.54%1.97%1.62%
OMFL
Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
0.99%1.22%1.37%1.55%0.95%1.48%1.53%1.39%0.32%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ROUS vs. OMFL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROUS drawdown since its inception was -35.51%, which is greater than OMFL's maximum drawdown of -33.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROUS and OMFL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

ROUS vs. OMFL - Volatility Comparison

Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) and Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL) have volatilities of 5.55% and 5.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...