ROUS vs. QQQ
ROUS (Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ROUS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Hartford Multi-factor Large Cap Index, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ROUS returned 13.10%/yr vs 22.48%/yr for QQQ. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ROUS charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
ROUS vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROUS achieves a 16.38% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 20.41% return. Over the past 10 years, ROUS has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 13.10%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 22.48% annualized return.
ROUS
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 1.79%
- YTD
- 16.38%
- 6M
- 15.03%
- 1Y
- 30.10%
- 3Y*
- 20.23%
- 5Y*
- 12.99%
- 10Y*
- 13.10%
QQQ
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 2.96%
- YTD
- 20.41%
- 6M
- 19.46%
- 1Y
- 40.91%
- 3Y*
- 27.47%
- 5Y*
- 16.94%
- 10Y*
- 22.48%
ROUS vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROUS Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF | 16.38% | 15.21% | 17.61% | 15.05% | -9.65% | 27.33% | 6.61% | 23.94% | -9.59% | 22.88% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 20.41% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROUS and QQQ is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2015 | 0.68 |
The correlation between ROUS and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
ROUS vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ROUS
QQQ
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
ROUS
QQQ
Healthcare
ROUS
QQQ
Financial Services
ROUS
QQQ
Industrials
ROUS
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
ROUS
QQQ
Communication Services
ROUS
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
ROUS
QQQ
Utilities
ROUS
QQQ
Energy
ROUS
QQQ
Basic Materials
ROUS
QQQ
Real Estate
ROUS
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROUS vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
ROUS
QQQ
ROUS vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ROUS | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.41 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.06 | 3.44 | +1.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.49 | 12.79 | +7.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ROUS vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROUS drawdown since its inception was -35.51%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROUS and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROUS | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.51% | -82.97% | +47.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.97% | -11.96% | +5.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.81% | -22.77% | +6.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.91% | -35.12% | +16.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.51% | -35.12% | -0.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.02% | -0.99% | -0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.22% | -32.73% | +28.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.47% | 3.21% | -1.74% |
Volatility
ROUS vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) is 3.89%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 8.47%. This indicates that ROUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROUS | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.89% | 8.47% | -4.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.91% | 14.20% | -5.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.68% | 17.67% | -5.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.43% | 22.64% | -8.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.98% | 22.43% | -5.45% |
ROUS vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
ROUS has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ROUS vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
ROUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, more than QQQ's 0.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.49% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
ROUS Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF | 1.32% | 1.52% | 1.62% | 1.91% | 1.88% | 1.38% | 2.01% | 2.12% | 1.89% | 1.54% | 1.97% | 1.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ROUS and QQQ have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQ has higher volatility (8.47%) compared to ROUS (3.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROUS dropped -35.51% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 22.48% vs 13.10% for ROUS. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, ROUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 22.48% return vs 13.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for ROUS.
ROUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.32%, compared with 0.49% for QQQ.
ROUS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. ROUS tracks Hartford Multi-factor Large Cap Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Hartford and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ROUS and 0.18% for QQQ.
ROUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ROUS and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer