PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ROUS vs. MEME
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ROUS vs. MEME

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ROUS (Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF) and MEME (Roundhill Meme Stock ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. ROUS is passively managed, while MEME is actively managed. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ROUS charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for MEME.

Performance

ROUS vs. MEME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROUS achieves a 16.55% return, which is significantly lower than MEME's 79.03% return.

ROUS

1D
0.01%
1M
6.18%
YTD
16.55%
6M
16.75%
1Y
29.42%
3Y*
20.87%
5Y*
12.84%
10Y*
13.01%

MEME

1D
-5.29%
1M
25.28%
YTD
79.03%
6M
68.18%
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROUS vs. MEME - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
ROUS
Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF		16.55%0.33%
MEME
Roundhill Meme Stock ETF		79.03%-36.83%

Correlation

The correlation between ROUS and MEME is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025

0.57

ROUS vs. MEME - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
ROUS
MEME

Technology

33.2%
58.8%

Healthcare

10.7%
5.4%

Financial Services

10.6%
5.7%

Industrials

10.4%
29.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%

-

Communication Services

8.6%
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

5.8%

-

Utilities

3.8%
10.7%

Energy

3.0%
4.8%

Basic Materials

2.2%
4.6%

Real Estate

2.1%

-

Technology

ROUS
33.2%
MEME
58.8%

Healthcare

ROUS
10.7%
MEME
5.4%

Financial Services

ROUS
10.6%
MEME
5.7%

Industrials

ROUS
10.4%
MEME
29.9%

Consumer Cyclical

ROUS
9.6%
MEME

-

Communication Services

ROUS
8.6%
MEME
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

ROUS
5.8%
MEME

-

Utilities

ROUS
3.8%
MEME
10.7%

Energy

ROUS
3.0%
MEME
4.8%

Basic Materials

ROUS
2.2%
MEME
4.6%

Real Estate

ROUS
2.1%
MEME

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF

Roundhill Meme Stock ETF

Often compared with ROUS:
ROUS vs. PALCROUS vs. VFMFXROUS vs. VSMVROUS vs. DYNFROUS vs. OMFLROUS vs. QQQROUS vs. SPMO
Often compared with MEME:
MEME vs. AFLGMEME vs. ANEWMEME vs. IWFMEME vs. URAMEME vs. BCHPMEME vs. QQQMMEME vs. TMFC

Return for Risk

ROUS vs. MEME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ROUS
ROUS Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
ROUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
ROUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
MEME
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROUS vs. MEME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

ROUSMEMEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.60

—

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.67

—

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

—

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.95

—

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.38

—

—

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ROUS vs. MEME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

ROUSMEMEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.60

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.28

+0.39

Drawdowns

ROUS vs. MEME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROUS drawdown since its inception was -35.51%, smaller than the maximum MEME drawdown of -48.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROUS and MEME.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ROUSMEMEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.51%

-48.78%

+13.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.97%

—

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.81%

—

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.91%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.51%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.93%

+5.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.24%

-29.90%

+25.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.45%

—

—

Volatility

ROUS vs. MEME - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ROUSMEMEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.54%

—

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.50%

—

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.37%

74.19%

-62.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.38%

74.19%

-59.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.96%

74.19%

-57.23%

ROUS vs. MEME - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROUS has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than MEME's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

ROUS vs. MEME - Dividend Comparison

ROUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, while MEME has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MEME
Roundhill Meme Stock ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ROUS
Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF		1.32%1.52%1.62%1.91%1.88%1.38%2.01%2.12%1.89%1.54%1.97%1.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

ROUS and MEME have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ROUS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ROUS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for MEME.

ROUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.32%, compared with 0.00% for MEME.

They also come from different issuers: Hartford and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ROUS and 0.69% for MEME.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROUS and MEME

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer