PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MEME vs. BELT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MEME vs. BELT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME) and iShares U.S. Select Equity Active ETF (BELT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MEME achieves a 89.03% return, which is significantly higher than BELT's 18.01% return.


MEME

1D
4.46%
1M
34.40%
YTD
89.03%
6M
82.84%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BELT

1D
-0.14%
1M
3.28%
YTD
18.01%
6M
16.08%
1Y
27.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MEME vs. BELT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
MEME
Roundhill Meme Stock ETF
89.03%-36.83%
BELT
iShares U.S. Select Equity Active ETF
18.01%-0.22%

Correlation

The correlation between MEME and BELT is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025

0.59

MEME vs. BELT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MEME
BELT

Technology

58.8%
33.0%

Industrials

29.9%
27.3%

Utilities

10.7%
0.1%

Financial Services

5.7%
12.9%

Communication Services

5.5%
14.7%

Healthcare

5.4%
0.4%

Energy

4.8%
0.2%

Basic Materials

4.6%
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.2%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Technology

MEME
58.8%
BELT
33.0%

Industrials

MEME
29.9%
BELT
27.3%

Utilities

MEME
10.7%
BELT
0.1%

Financial Services

MEME
5.7%
BELT
12.9%

Communication Services

MEME
5.5%
BELT
14.7%

Healthcare

MEME
5.4%
BELT
0.4%

Energy

MEME
4.8%
BELT
0.2%

Basic Materials

MEME
4.6%
BELT
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

MEME

-

BELT
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

MEME

-

BELT
0.2%

Real Estate

MEME

-

BELT
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MEME vs. BELT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MEME

BELT
BELT Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
BELT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BELT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
BELT Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
BELT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
BELT Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MEME vs. BELT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME) and iShares U.S. Select Equity Active ETF (BELT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MEME vs. BELT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MEMEBELTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.68

-0.25

Drawdowns

MEME vs. BELT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEME drawdown since its inception was -48.78%, which is greater than BELT's maximum drawdown of -23.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEME and BELT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MEMEBELTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.78%

-23.05%

-25.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.68%

-1.32%

+0.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.05%

-3.51%

-26.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.86%

Volatility

MEME vs. BELT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MEMEBELTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

74.11%

17.01%

+57.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

74.11%

21.23%

+52.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

74.11%

21.23%

+52.88%

MEME vs. BELT - Expense Ratio Comparison

MEME has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than BELT's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

MEME vs. BELT - Dividend Comparison

Neither MEME nor BELT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


MEME and BELT have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MEME is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MEME is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BELT.

MEME and BELT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for MEME and 0.75% for BELT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MEME and BELT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer