ROP vs. HUBS
ROP (Roper Technologies, Inc.) and HUBS (HubSpot, Inc.) are both stocks. ROP operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while HUBS operates in Software - Application (Technology). Over the past 10 years, ROP returned 7.73%/yr vs 14.57%/yr for HUBS. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ROP vs. HUBS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROP achieves a -24.40% return, which is significantly higher than HUBS's -53.16% return. Over the past 10 years, ROP has underperformed HUBS with an annualized return of 7.73%, while HUBS has yielded a comparatively higher 14.57% annualized return.
ROP
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 4.38%
- YTD
- -24.40%
- 6M
- -24.53%
- 1Y
- -39.80%
- 3Y*
- -9.19%
- 5Y*
- -5.54%
- 10Y*
- 7.73%
HUBS
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- -5.24%
- YTD
- -53.16%
- 6M
- -50.00%
- 1Y
- -66.10%
- 3Y*
- -28.43%
- 5Y*
- -18.40%
- 10Y*
- 14.57%
ROP vs. HUBS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROP Roper Technologies, Inc. | -24.40% | -13.85% | -4.11% | 26.92% | -11.64% | 14.69% | 22.39% | 33.66% | 3.51% | 42.39% |
HUBS HubSpot, Inc. | -53.16% | -42.41% | 20.02% | 100.79% | -56.14% | 66.27% | 150.12% | 26.06% | 42.23% | 88.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROP and HUBS is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2014 | 0.39 |
The correlation between ROP and HUBS shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (all time) to 0.50 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ROP:
$35.04B
HUBS:
$9.88B
ROP:
$15.98
HUBS:
$1.91
ROP:
20.96
HUBS:
98.67
ROP:
2.48
HUBS:
0.11
ROP:
4.43
HUBS:
3.00
ROP:
1.86
HUBS:
4.95
ROP:
$8.12B
HUBS:
$3.30B
ROP:
$5.63B
HUBS:
$2.76B
ROP:
$3.24B
HUBS:
$196.96M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROP vs. HUBS — Risk / Return Rank
ROP
HUBS
ROP vs. HUBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP) and HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ROP | HUBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.70 | 0.77 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.92 | -0.99 | +0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.51 | -1.66 | +0.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ROP vs. HUBS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROP drawdown since its inception was -58.94%, smaller than the maximum HUBS drawdown of -78.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROP and HUBS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROP | HUBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.94% | -78.99% | +20.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.65% | -68.09% | +23.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.51% | -78.16% | +31.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.51% | -78.99% | +32.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.51% | -78.99% | +32.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.07% | -77.94% | +34.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.43% | -23.21% | +11.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.25% | 40.95% | -13.70% |
Volatility
ROP vs. HUBS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP) is 8.14%, while HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) has a volatility of 27.45%. This indicates that ROP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HUBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROP | HUBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.14% | 27.45% | -19.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.59% | 55.03% | -33.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.08% | 62.97% | -37.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.39% | 55.02% | -33.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.34% | 50.98% | -27.64% |
Dividends
ROP vs. HUBS - Dividend Comparison
ROP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, while HUBS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUBS HubSpot, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ROP Roper Technologies, Inc. | 1.04% | 0.74% | 0.58% | 0.50% | 0.57% | 0.46% | 0.48% | 0.52% | 0.62% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.53% |
Financials
ROP vs. HUBS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Roper Technologies, Inc. and HubSpot, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ROP vs. HUBS - Profitability Comparison
ROP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Roper Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.45B and revenue of 2.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.4%.
HUBS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HubSpot, Inc. reported a gross profit of 735.30M and revenue of 881.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 83.5%.
ROP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Roper Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 569.60M and revenue of 2.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.2%.
HUBS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HubSpot, Inc. reported an operating income of 27.94M and revenue of 881.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.2%.
ROP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Roper Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 508.90M and revenue of 2.10B, resulting in a net margin of 24.3%.
HUBS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HubSpot, Inc. reported a net income of 32.55M and revenue of 881.00M, resulting in a net margin of 3.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ROP and HUBS have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HUBS has higher volatility (27.45%) compared to ROP (8.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROP dropped -58.94% vs HUBS's -78.99%.
HUBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.07 vs -1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ROP and HUBS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer